SMT.SAVITHA v. M/S ROYAL SUNDARAM ALLIANCE
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms
Provisions considered
- Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 s. 173(1)
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly.
- Para 66. The office shall accordingly prepare the award and shall ensure that the award made today is communicated to the Tribunal for appropriate action. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER BVK
Judgment
MR.H.PAVANA CHANDRA SHETTY., MEMBER M.F.A.No.2700/2024 (Lok Adalat No.5934/2025) BETWEEN
1. SMT.SAVITHA, W/O LATE MUNIRAJU, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,
2. KUM.M.YESHASWINI, D/O LATE MUNIRAJU, AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS,
3. MR.M.YASHWANTH, S/O LATE MUNIRAJU, AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS, APPELLANT NO.1,2 AND 3 ARE R/AT: KANCHIGANALA VILLAGE, RAJAGHATTA POST, THUBAGERE HOBLI, DODDABALLAPURA TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT.
4. SMT KAMALAMMA, W/O LATE UTTANALLAPPA, 2 AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, R/AT: BYRANDAHALLI,KYALANUR, BANGARPET KOLAR-563 101. (BY SRI.K.T.GURUDEVA PRASAD, ADVOCATE) ...APPELLANTS AND
M/S ROYAL SUNDARAM ALLIANCE INSURANCE CO. LTD., BY ITS MANAGER, MOTOR CLAIMS HUB, NO.30, 3RD FLOOR, JNR CITY CENTRE, RAJARAM MOHAN ROY ROAD, S.R.NAGAR, BENGALURU-560 027.
SYED AFSAR, S/O SYED SHAHEEB SAB, NO.44 N.N.T.ROAD, MAHABOOB NAGAR, CHINTAMANI, CHIKKABALLAPURA PIN-563 125. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.S.KRISHNA KISHORE, ADVOCATE ) THIS MFA IS FILED U/S.173(1) OF MV ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 01.10.2022 PASSED IN MVC NO.6056/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE V ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSES JUDGE AND XXIV A.C.M.M. MEMBER M.A.C.T, MAYO HALL UNIT, BENGALURU (SCCH-20), PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. 3 THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED: CONCILIATION ORDER Learned Counsel appearing for the Appellants - Claimants is present. Learned Counsel appearing for Respondent No.1 – Insurance Company along with its representative are present.
2. After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. A joint memo signed by the learned advocate appearing for the appellants/claimants (being authorized appellants/claimants to sign) and learned advocate appearing for respondent No.1-Insurance Company and its authorized officer is filed. The appellants-claimants have agreed to receive and respondent No.1-Insurance Company has agreed to pay a lump- sum of Rs.1,50,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Fifty Thousand only), in addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim.
Respondent No.1- Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within six weeks 4 from the date of preparation of award, failing which, the said amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% P.A. from the date of default, till the date of deposit.
The apportionment, deposit and release of the enhanced compensation amount shall be made in terms of the Judgment and Award passed by the Claims Tribunal.
Operative part
This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly.
The office shall accordingly prepare the award and shall ensure that the award made today is communicated to the Tribunal for appropriate action. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER BVK
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — s. 173(1).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.