(BY SRI. MAHESH ARKALGUD SRIKANTH., ADVOCATE) v. BENGALURU -560 008
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 482
Judgment
1. MR. BASANT GOEL AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, SON OF REKESH KUMAR GOEL.
2. MRS. SEEMA GOEL AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, WIFE OF MR. BASANT GOEL. BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO. 3061, ONE BANGALORE, WEST APARTMENT, DR. RAJKUMAR ROAD, RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 010. Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA (BY SRI. MAHESH ARKALGUD SRIKANTH., ADVOCATE) …PETITIONERS AND:
STATE OF KARNATAKA BY NELAMANGALA RURAL POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY THE STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU-560 001.
YOGESH KUMAR NO.D-1 NITHIN HEIGHTS, - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC:23993 WP No. 12354 of 2024 2ND 'A' CROSS, BANASHANKARI 3RD STAGE, BENGALURU -560 008 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. P. THEJESH, HCGP FOR R1) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 482 OF CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO FILE A REPORT/CHARGE SHEET IN CRIME NO. 195/2023 PENDING BEFORE THE HONOURABLE COURT OF PRL. CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN) AND JMFC COURT, NELAMANGALA, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT (ANNEXURE-A) BY ISSUING A WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER ORDER OR WRIT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER Learned High Court Government Pleader on instructions would submit the Police after investigation have filed a ‘B Report’ in favour of these petitioners and the concerned court has also accepted the ‘B Report’ and closed the proceedings. - 3 - NC: 2024:KHC:23993 WP No. 12354 of 2024
2. In the light of the said circumstance, the present petition is rendered infructuous and is disposed of as having become infructuous, reserving liberty to the petitioners to prompt at the doors of the appropriate for a and approach the Court in the event of need. Sd/- JUDGE JJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 23
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.