THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX v. Court of Karnataka
Case at a glance
- Bench
- KRISHNA S DIXIT, RAMACHANDRA D HUDDAR, EQUITY
- Neutral citation
- 2025:KHC:13841-DB
Provisions considered
Judgment
(BY SRI. SUSHAL TIWARI N., ADVOCATE) AND: …APPELLANTS Location: High Court of Karnataka M/S. CONDUENT BUSINESS SERVICES INDIA LLP (FORMERLY KNOWN AS XEROX BUSINESS SERVICES INDIA PVT LTD ) UNIT-A, 5TH FLOOR, AVIATOR BUILDING, WHITEFIELD ROAD, ASCENDAS ITPB SEZ INTERNATIONAL TECH PARK, BENGALURU-560066. (BY SMT. JINITA CHATTERJEE, ADVOCATE) ….RESPONDENT THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SEC.260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, PRAYING THAT THIS HON'BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO:
FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED ABOVE. - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:13841-DB ITA No. 315 of 2023
ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU IN IT(TP)A NO.3346/BANG/2018 DATED 13.09.2022 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2014-2015 ANNEXURE-D AND CONFIRM THE ORDER OF THE DRP CONFIRMING THE ORDER PASSED BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1)(1), BENGALURU.
TO PASS SUCH OTHER SUITABLE ORDERS AS THIS HON'BLE COURT DEEMS FIT TO GRANT IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT AND HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT) Heard the learned counsel Shri. Sushal Tiwari.N., for the Appellants/Revenue and Ms.Jinita Chatterjee, learned counsel for the Respondent/Assessee.
2. The Revenue is in appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 questioning the correctness and legality of order dated 13.09.2022 passed by the - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:13841-DB ITA No. 315 of 2023 Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bengaluru (for short, ‘Appellate Authority’) in IT(TP)A No.3346/Bang/2018 for the Assessment Year 2014-2015.
3. Learned counsel for the assessee submits that the tax effect in this Appeal is less than Rs.2 Crores and therefore, the appeal should not be entertained at the instance of the Revenue in view of the Circular No.09/2024 dated 17.09.2024 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes. It is also submitted that the aforesaid Circular binds the Revenue.
On the other hand, learned counsel for the Revenue submits that he be granted liberty to revive the Appeal in case the matter falls within the exceptions under the aforesaid Circular dated 17.09.2024 and Circular No.5/2024 dated 15.03.2024. In view of the aforesaid submissions, the Appeal is disposed off with liberty as prayed for by the learned counsel for the Revenue, without admitting the Appeal. - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:13841-DB ITA No. 315 of 2023 However, the question of law is kept open to be adjudicated in an appropriate proceeding. Sd/- (KRISHNA S DIXIT) JUDGE Sd/- (RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR) JUDGE DH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.