✦ Karnataka High Court

(BY SRI. SHANMUKHAPPA., ADVOCATE) v. KARWAR-571112

Writ Petition No. 11324 of 2021R DEVDAS

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of,

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of, for the reasons stated above. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE JT/- CT-JL

Judgment

Cause title

C N VENUGOPAL S/O SHRI C.NARAYANASWAMY AGED 37 YEARS, R/O CHANNAHALLI VILLAGE, CHANNARAYAPATNA HOBLI DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BENGALURU DIST-560082. (BY SRI. SHANMUKHAPPA., ADVOCATE) …PETITIONER

THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AND:

1. PRATHMESH APARTMENTS CO OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED NO.14/B/4, 9TH CROSS, MALLESWARAM BENGALURU-560 003 REP BY ITS SECRETARY SHRI L.M.MURALIDHARAN S/O MADAN GOPAL AGED 38 YEARS, R/AT NO.4, FRUIT STREET, KAMARAJ ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001. - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC:34019 WP No. 11324 of 2021

2. SHRI G.NARASIMHA MURTHY S/O GIRIYAPPA AGED 65 YEARS, R/O NO.1, KUMARA PARK EAST, BENGALURU-560 001.

3. SHRI D.B.SATISH S/O LATE SHRI D.R.BASAVARAJU AGED 62 YEARS, NO.2, 4TH D BLOCK, III STAGE, BASAVESWHARANAGAR BENGALURU-560079.

4. SHRI ANAND V ASNOTIKAR S/O LATE VASANTH ASNOTIKAR R/AT BEHIND NFO HALL M.G.ROAD, KARWAR-571112 …RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI.M.V.VEDAMURTHY., ADVOCATE FOR R1 V/O/D. 28.07.2021, SERVICE OF NOTICE TO R2 TO R4 IS D/W) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DTD.4.6.2021 PASSED BY THE LEARNED 14TH ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL JUDGE (CCH-28) BENGALURU CITY IN O.S.NO.6221/2020 ON IA NO.10 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND REJECT THE SAID IA NO.10 FILED UNDER

ORDER-

1 RULE 10(2) OF THE CPC VIDE ANNEXURE-E AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN B GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - NC: 2024:KHC:34019 WP No. 11324 of 2021 CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned Counsel for respondent No.1 submits that the original suit from out of which the present writ petition arises viz., O.S.No.6621/2020 has been disposed of on

26.08.2021 and therefore, the prayer made in the petition has become infructuous.

2.

The submission of the learned Counsel for respondent No.1 is placed on record.

Operative part

3.

Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of, for the reasons stated above. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE JT/- CT-JL

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of,

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India — art. 227; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — r. 10(2).

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 11324 of 2021). ← Search more judgments