Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- H N NAGAMOHAN DAS
Outcome
Dismissed
petition is hereby dismissed for non-
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. SMT.MALLIGE W/O SRI S.I.KUMAR AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS BOTH ARE RESIDING AT: NO.23, MALLIGE, 1ST MAIN ROAD MANI VILAS GARDEN, KAMAKSHIPALYA, BANGALORE-560079. ..PETITIONERS (BY SRI T.SUBRAMANYA, ADV.ABSENT) AND: STATE OF KARNATAKA REP.BY POLICE INSPECTOR VIDHANA SOUDHA POLICE STATION BANGALORE, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH…
Judgment
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE H.N.NAGAMOHAN DAS CRL.P.No.1971/2012 BETWEEN ------- 1. SRI S.I.KUMAR AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS S/O LATE SRI SUBBAIAH
Operative part
SMT.MALLIGE W/O SRI S.I.KUMAR AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS BOTH ARE RESIDING AT: NO.23, MALLIGE, 1ST MAIN ROAD MANI VILAS GARDEN, KAMAKSHIPALYA, BANGALORE-560079. ..PETITIONERS (BY SRI T.SUBRAMANYA, ADV.ABSENT) AND: STATE OF KARNATAKA REP.BY POLICE INSPECTOR VIDHANA SOUDHA POLICE STATION BANGALORE, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDINGS, BANGALORE ..RESPONDENT 2 CRL.P 482 CR.P.C.PRAYING TO QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.22332/2008. SECTION UNDER FILED This petition coming on for orders, this day, the court made the following: (cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:2)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:2)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:2)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:2) This is the third time the matter is appearing before the Court for non-compliance of office objections. In the first round when matter called representation. The matter was passed over enabling learned counsel for the petitioner to comply the office objections. Again when the matter is called in the post lunch session there is no representation. Accordingly, the petition is hereby dismissed for non- prosecution. (cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:7)(cid:8) JUDGE. DKB
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: petition is hereby dismissed for non-
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.