MURTHY v. STATE OF KARNATAKA
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
Accordingly, the petition is allowed
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 439
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 143, 147, 148, 149, 307, 323, 324
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Considering the filing of the charge sheet and the circumstances and the offence alleged against the petitioner, I find that the petitioner could be enlarged on bail. Accordingly, the petition is allowed. Petitioner is enlarged on bail subject to the following conditions: 3 i)…
Judgment
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHASH B ADI CRIMINAL PETITION No.1969/2012 BETWEEN : MURTHY AGED 18 YEARS S/O SHEKAR R/AT NO.84, AKIYAPPA GARDEN, MOHANKUMARNAGARA, YESWANTHURA, BANGALORE ( By Sri. LAKSHMIKANTH. K, ADV.,) ...PETITIONER AND : STATE OF KARNATAKA BY YESHWANTHAURA POLICE STATION BY ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR ...RESPONDENT (BY SRI. G.M.SRINIVASA REDDY, HCGP) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 CR.P.C PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL INCR.NO.33/2012 OF YESHWANTHAPURA POLICE STATION, BANGALORE CITY FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 143, 147, 148, 323, 324, 307, 149 OF IPC. THIS PETITION IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: 2
O R D E R Petitioner is accused No.12. He has been charge sheeted for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 323, 324, 307 read with Section 149 of IPC.
Complainant's brother was assaulted by one Sannu, Manu, Suresh, Mahesh, Shashikumar, Muthu, Armugam, Kumaresh and others with club, cricket bat, etc.,.
As far as this petitioner is concerned, it appears that, initially his name was not mentioned, subsequently, during the course of investigation, his name appears to have been mentioned.
Operative part
Considering the filing of the charge sheet and the circumstances and the offence alleged against the petitioner, I find that the petitioner could be enlarged on bail. Accordingly, the petition is allowed. Petitioner is enlarged on bail subject to the following conditions: 3 i) The petitioner shall execute a personal bond for Rs.25,000/- with two solvent sureties for the like sum to the satisfaction of the Trial Court. ii) He shall regularly attend the Court on hearing dates. iii) He shall not tamper with the prosecution witnesses. Sd/- JUDGE KNM/-
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the petition is allowed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 439; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 143, 147, 148, 149, 307, 323, 324.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.