PERIYAPATNA v. PERIYAPATNA
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Hence, the petition is dismissed for
Provisions considered
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
- Constitution of India arts. 226, 227
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. In spite of granting sufficient time, office objections are not complied with and the matter is posted for the second time before the Court. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- JUDGE KM
Judgment
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH WRIT PETITION NO.12519 OF 2012 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1 SRI SURESH S H S/O LATE HANUMAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 2 SRI VISHWANATH S H S/O LATE HANUMAPPA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS 3 SRI RAJASHEKAR S H S/O LATE HANUMAPPA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS 4 SRI SRINIVAS S H S/O LATE HANUMAPPA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS 5 SMT PARVATHAMMA W/O LATE HANUMAPPA AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS PETITIONER NOS.2 TO 5 ARE REP BY PETITIONER NO.1 HEREIN PETITIONER NOS.1 TO 5 ARE R/O DODDAKAMARAVALLI VILLAGE HARANAHALLI HOBLI 2 PERIYAPATNA TALUK. ...PETITIONERS (BY M/S: P V RAMESH KUMAR & ASSOCIATES, ADVOCATES – ABSENT) AND: 1 SRI BYRAIAH S/O BORAIAH AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS 2 SMT GOWRAMMA W/O LATE SANNAIAH AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS 3 SRI SIDDAIAH S/O BORAIAH AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS 4 SRI PUTTAIAH S/O BORAIAH AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS 5 SRI SWAMAIAH S/O BORAIAH AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS RESPONDENT NOS.1 TO 5 ARE R/O DODDAKAMARAVALLI VILLAGE HARANAHALLI HOBLI PERIYAPATNA TALUK. ...RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 5.4.2012 PASSED ON I.A.NO.41 IN FDP NO.8/1997 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, PERIYAPATNA, AND CONSEQUENTLY DIRECT THE TRIAL COURT TO HEAR THE ARGUMENTS OF THE PETITIONERS HEREIN AND PASS FINAL DECREE. 3 THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R None appears for the petitioners nor any representation is made.
Operative part
In spite of granting sufficient time, office objections are not complied with and the matter is posted for the second time before the Court. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- JUDGE KM
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Hence, the petition is dismissed for
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908; Constitution of India — arts. 226, 227.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.