SRI ASLAM v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY CHIKKABALLAPUR POLICE STATION
Case at a glance
- Bench
- SUBHASH B ADI
Outcome
Allowed
Accordingly, the petition is allowed
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 439
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 s. 379
- Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 ss. 86, 87
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Considering the judicial custody and the circumstances, I find that, the petitioner could be enlarged on bail. Accordingly, the petition is allowed. Petitioner is enlarged on bail subject to the following conditions: (i) The petitioner shall execute a personal bond for Rs.25,000/- with two…
Judgment
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHASH B. ADI CRIMINAL PETITION No.3322/2012 BETWEEN : SRI ASLAM AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS S/O ABDUL AJEEZ, R/AT KATTIGENAHALLI VILLAGE, HOSKOTE TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DIST. ...PETITIONER ( BY SRI. P.M.SIDDAMALLAPPA, ADV., FOR MYLARAIAH ASSOCIATES, ADVS. ) AND : THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY CHIKKABALLAPUR POLICE STATION CHIKKABALLAPUR TALUK AND DIST., ( BY SRI. SATISH R GIRJI, HCGP ) ...RESPONDENT THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 CR.P.C PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN CR.NO.225/2012 OF CHICKBALLAPURA P.S., CHICKBALLAPURA FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 86, 87 OF KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 AND SECTION 379 OF IPC. 2 THIS PETITION IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER Petitioner is the accused in Crime No.225/2012 registered by Chickballapura Police, for the offence punishable under Sections 86 and 87 of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 read with Section 379 of IPC.
It is alleged that the petitioner was illegally possessing sandal wood pieces weighing 20 Kgs.
Operative part
Considering the judicial custody and the circumstances, I find that, the petitioner could be enlarged on bail. Accordingly, the petition is allowed. Petitioner is enlarged on bail subject to the following conditions:
(i) The petitioner shall execute a personal bond for Rs.25,000/- with two solvent sureties for the like sum to the satisfaction of the Trial Court. 3 (ii) He shall regularly attend the Court on hearing dates.
(iii) He shall not tamper with the prosecution witnesses. Sd/- JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the petition is allowed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 439; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — s. 379; Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 — ss. 86, 87.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.