KIRAN S v. THE STATE BY THE STATE BY ARASIKERE
Case at a glance
Outcome
Bail refused
Hence, bail application is rejected
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. On perusal of the said order, it appears that if a bail application is filed by the petitioner along with surety, the Trial Court may consider the application and pass appropriate orders. Therefore, it is deemed appropriate to dispose of this petition with a…
Judgment
Operative part
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 4477 OF 2026 (439(Cr.PC) / 483(BNSS)) BETWEEN: KIRAN S S/O SWAMY, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, RESIDING AT PETE DARJE BEEDI, HOLENARASIPURA, TOWN HASSAN, KARNATAKA. (BY SRI. ANANDA RAMACHANDRA DASS., ADVOCATE) …PETITIONER Digitally signed by PAVITHRA N Location: High Court of Karnataka AND: THE STATE BY THE STATE BY ARASIKERE RAILWAY POLICE STATION, STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT COMPLEX, BENGALURU - 560 001. (BY SMT. ANITHA GIRISH N., HCGP) …RESPONDENT - 2 - NC: 2026:KHC:23499 CRL.P No. 4477 of 2026 HC-KAR THIS CRL.P FILED U/S 439 CR.PC (FILED U/S 483 BNNS) BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING TO GRANT BAIL TO THE PETITIONER AND DIRECT THE PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, AT HASSAN TO RELEASE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN SPL.C.NO.454/2025 REGISTERED FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 20(b)(ii)B OF THE NDPS ACT 1985 IN CRIME NO.31/2025, REGISTERED IN ARASIKERE RAILWAY POLICE STATION. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH ORAL ORDER The petitioner is before this Court, being aggrieved by the order dated 03.03.2026, passed by the learned Prl. District and Sessions Judge, Hassan which reads as follows: “Case advanced and on the application filed by Hassan HR Advocate along with NOC Vakalath on behalf of accused No.1 and 2 and also filed bail application under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of A-2. The bail bond of accused No.2 was cancelled as he has not produced the sureties before the Court since there is an allegation against said surety that he has impersonated the owner of the property which is offered as a surety. - 3 - NC: 2026:KHC:23499 CRL.P No. 4477 of 2026 HC-KAR Until he produced the surety, he is not entitled to file any bail application. Hence, bail application is rejected. Call on
12.03.2026.”
On perusal of the said order, it appears that if a bail application is filed by the petitioner along with surety, the Trial Court may consider the application and pass appropriate orders. Therefore, it is deemed appropriate to dispose of this petition with a direction to the petitioner to approach the Trial Court with a fresh application and surety. If such an application is filed, the Trial Court is directed to dispose of the same on the same day. Ordered, accordingly. Sd/- (S RACHAIAH) JUDGE JS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 38
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Hence, bail application is rejected
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 439; Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 483; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.