SRI. PARTHASARATHI D v. M/S INDIAN BANK
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non-
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 226, 227
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 8956 OF 2022 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: SRI. PARTHASARATHI D S/O SRI. G DEVARAJA MODALI AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/AT NO.276/A, GKW LAYOUT, PEENYA II STAGE, BENGALURU - 560 058. (BY SRI. SUDHINDRA B S.,ADVOCATE) …PETITIONER AND: M/S INDIAN BANK, KASTHURINAGAR BRANCH, BANGALORE - 560 043. REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER AND AUTHORIZED OFFICER (BY SMT. ANNAPURNA., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. ASHOK NAIK.,ADVOCATE) …RESPONDENT THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE SALE NOTICE THROUGH E-AUCTION AS PER ANNEXURE-A AS ILLEGAL AND IN VIOLATION OF PRINCIPLES OF NATURAL JUSTICE AND DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER THE CASE OF THE PETITIONER UNDER OTS SCHEME AS PER THE REPRESENTATION DTD.21.3.2022 AND 5.42022 VIDE ANNEXURE-D SERIES RESPECTIVELY. Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2026:KHC:20996 WP No. 8956 of 2022 HC-KAR THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI ORAL ORDER The present writ petition is filed in the year 2022. When the matter came up on15.04.2026, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and matter was directed to be listed under the caption for ‘dismissal’ on 16.04.2026. Today, also when the matter came up under the caption for ‘dismissal’ there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the matter. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE TS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 74
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non-
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 226, 227.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.