OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10 TH DAY OF JULY v. ANJARIA
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 ss. 11, 12
- Constitution of India art. 215
Key paragraphs
- Para 11. SRI. SREEVISHNU B.S. AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS S/O B.L. SREERAMESH R/AT F-1, BRINDAVAN APARTMENT PATELAPPA LAYOUT NAGASHETTY HALLI SANJAYANAGAR POST BENGALURU - 560 094 (BY SRI. DILLI RAJA, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SUBBA REDDY K.N., ADVOCATE) …COMPLAINANT …ACCUSED THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11…
Judgment
(BY SRI. CHETHAN S.P., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. NISHANTH A.V., ADVOCATE) AND:
SRI. SREEVISHNU B.S. AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS S/O B.L. SREERAMESH R/AT F-1, BRINDAVAN APARTMENT PATELAPPA LAYOUT NAGASHETTY HALLI SANJAYANAGAR POST BENGALURU - 560 094 (BY SRI. DILLI RAJA, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SUBBA REDDY K.N., ADVOCATE) …COMPLAINANT …ACCUSED THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, R/W ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, BY THE COMPLAINANT, WHERE IN HE PRAYS Digitally signed by PRABHAKAR SWETHA KRISHNAN Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC:26477-DB CCC No. 394 of 2024 THAT THE HONBLE COURT BE PLEASED TO TAKE NECESSARY ACTION AGAINST THE ACCUSED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971 FOR WILLFULLY AND DELIBERATELY VIOLATING THE ORDER DATED 21.04.2023 PASSED BY THIS HONBLE COURT IN W.P.NO.2517/2023 (EDN-RES) VIDE ANNEXURE - A. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM : HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N.V. ANJARIA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K.V. ARAVIND ORAL ORDER (PER : HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N.V. ANJARIA) Learned advocate Mr. S.P. Chethan for learned advocate Mr. A.V. Nishanth for the complainant states that the order of learned Single Judge brought under the contempt jurisdiction is already complied with. In view of the statement of learned advocate for the complainant, nothing survives the present contempt proceedings. They are accordingly disposed of as not surviving. Sd/- (N. V. ANJARIA) CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- (K V ARAVIND) JUDGE CR, List No.: 1 Sl No.: 39
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.