MR. GURURAJ HEJAMADY TATI RAO v. BENGALURU - 560092
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
Judgment
LLP INCORPORATED IN INDIA UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP ACT, 2008, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO. 4/16, 9TH MAIN ROAD, 3RD BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BANGALORE 560011 REPRESENTED BY ITS CEO AND DIRECTOR, MR. GURURAJ HEJAMADY TATI RAO
GURURAJGOVIND LIFE SCIENCES YELAHANKA LLP AN LLP INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP ACT, 2008, HAVING REGISTRATION NO. 24/YH-/S/0015/2018, AND HAVING REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.93, 1ST MAIN, 1ST PHASE, A SECTOR, YELAHANKA NEW TOWN, BANGALORE-560064. REP. BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY MR. GURURAJ HEJAMADY TATI RAO.
GURURAJGOVIND LIFESCIENCES WHITEFIELD LLP AN LLP INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP ACT, 2008 HAVING REGISTERED OFFICE AT 28/4, SIDDAPURA VILLAGE, Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:13832 WP No. 8606 of 2025 VARTHUR/WHITEFIELD MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU, KARNATAKA - 560066 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY MR. GURURAJ HEJAMADY TATI RAO …PETITIONERS (BY SMT. SNEHA NAGARAJ., ADVOCATE) AND:
M/S. VIJAYA DIAGNOSTIC CENTRE LIMITED COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT GROUND FLOOR, FPAI BUILDING, NEAR TOPAZ PLAZA, PUNJAGUTTA OFFICERS COLONY, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA - 500082 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER, MR. NARASIMHA RAJU KA
2. MR. NARASIMHA RAJU AGED MAJOR, HAVING HIS OFFICE AT GROUND FLOOR, FPAI BUILDING, NEAR TOPAZ PLAZA, PUNJAGUTTA OFFICERS COLONY, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA - 500082
3. DR. D. UMASHANKAR SON OF MR. DASANNA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 2403/1. E BLOCK, 13TH MAIN ROAD, SAHAKARNAGAR, BENGALURU - 560092. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAITREYI KANNUR, ADV. FOR C/R1.) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 19.03.2025 (ANNEXURE-A) PASSED BY THE TRIAL COURT IN OS NO. 1973/2025, WITH RESPECT TO - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:13832 WP No. 8606 of 2025 NOTICE ISSUED TO THE RESPONDENT NO.2 AND NO.3 AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD ORAL ORDER This petition is filed by the plaintiffs/petitioners under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging the order dated 19-03-2025 passed by the learned Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore, in OS No. 1973/2025.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners appearing through the Video Conferencing submitted that the above petition may be dismissed as withdrawn and to that effect, she is filing a memo in the Registry.
Operative part
3. In view of the said submission, the above writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE tsn* List No.: 1 Sl No.: 26
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908; Companies Act, 2013; Constitution of India — art. 227.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.