✦ Karnataka High Court

Smt. Geetha v. Shivarudra G.N

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 55. This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER Rbv

Judgment

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE T.G.SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA & SMT. PARINEETA S. CHANAL, MEMBER M.F.A.No. 5649/2019 (MV) (Lok Adalat No. 2252/2023) BETWEEN Smt. Geetha W/o Shivarudra G.N., Aged about 47 years, Residing at No.421, 1st Road, 16th Ward, Dara Bender Nagara, Gundlupet – 571 111. … Appellant. (BY SRI. H.V. BHANUPRAKASH, ADVOCATE) AND:

#1. Shivarudra G.N. S/o Nagaraj G.N., Major, Residing at No.421, Ashwini Badavane, Gundlupet Town – 571 111, (Owner cum Insured of the Swift Car bearing Registration No.KA-10/M-1544).

#2. The Divisional Manager, TATA IG General Insurance Co. Ltd., No.69, 2nd Floor, JP and Devi Jambukeshwar Arcade, Millers Road, Bengaluru-560 052, 2 (Insurer of the Swift Car bearing Regn. No.KA-10/M-1544), P.N. 015575639500 valid from 29.1.2016 to 28.1.2017). …Respondents (BY SRI. B. PRADEEP, ADVOCATE FOR R-2, NOTICE TO R-1 – D/W V.C.O. DATED 04.08.2023) MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 22.02.2019 PASSED IN MVC NO.50/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MACT, GUNDLUPET, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION ENHANCEMENT OF SEEKING COMPENSATION. AND THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED: CONCILIATION ORDER The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant - Claimant is present. The learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent – Insurance Company along with its representative are present.

#2. After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. A joint memo signed by the learned advocate appearing for the appellant/claimant (being authorized by the appellant/claimant to sign) and the learned advocate appearing for the respondent-Insurance Company and its authorized officer is filed. The appellant-claimant has agreed to receive and the respondent-Insurance 3 Company has agreed to pay a lump-sum of Rs.1,30,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Thirty Thousand only), in addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim.

#3. The Respondent - Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within six weeks from the date of preparation of award, failing which the said amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% P.A. from the date of default, till the date of deposit.

#4. The entire enhanced compensation amount shall be released in favour of the appellant/ claimant, on proper identification.

#5. This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER Rbv

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — s. 173(1).

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.

Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments