✦ Karnataka High Court

SRI RAVIKUMAR N.K v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P No. 3109 of 2024M I ARUN

Case at a glance

Judgment

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN CRIMINAL PETITION NO.3109 OF 2024 (482 (Cr.PC)/528(BNSS)) BETWEEN:

1. SRI RAVIKUMAR N.K. S/O KRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS,

2. SRI KRISHNA S/O SRI BANNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,

3. SMT. MEENAMMA W/O SRI KRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,

4. SRI APPU S/O SRI SWAMY, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS,

5. SMT. GEETHA W/O SRI SWAMY, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,

6. SRI SWAMY S/O LATE ANNAIAH AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, Digitally signed by GEETHA P G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA ALL THE PETITIONERS ARE RESIDENTS OF NORTH BANK VILLAGE, CHINAKURALI HOBLI, - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:52793 CRL.P No. 3109 of 2024 HC-KAR PANDAVAPURA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT-571 434. (BY SRI. HARIPRASAD M.B., ADVOCATE) …PETITIONERS AND:

1.

STATE OF KARNATAKA BY K.R. SAGARA POLICE STATION, K.R. SAGARA CIRCLE, MANDYA DISTRICT-571 434 REPRESENTED BY THE STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT COMPLEX, BENGALURU-560 001.

2.

SMT. ANJALI W/O. RAVIKUMAR, AGED ABOUT 17 YEARS, RESIDENTS OF NORTH BANK VILLAGE, CHINAKURALI HOBLI, PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT-571 434. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MOHAMMED AYUB ALI, ADDL. SPP., FOR R.1; R.2: SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS CRL.P. IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASH THE CHARGE SHEET FILED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 IN SPL.C.NO.33/2024, ON THE FILE OF THE LEARNED ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE-FTSC-II, (SPECIAL COURT FOR TRIAL OF RAPE CASES ALONG WITH POCSO ACT CASES), AT MANDYA FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE U/S.354(D), 366, 376(2)(n), UNDER SECTIONS 4, 6 AND 17 OF THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FROM SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT, U/S.9 AND 11 OF THE PROHIBITION OF CHILD MARRIAGE ACT, AT ANNEXURE-C IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE, ETC. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:52793 CRL.P No. 3109 of 2024 HC-KAR THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN ORAL ORDER

1. Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo dated 18.11.2025 with a prayer to dismiss the criminal petition as withdrawn.

2. The memo is taken on record. The criminal petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. SD/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE VMB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. CRL.P No. 3109 of 2024). ← Search more judgments