(BY SRI. Y HARIPRASAD.,ADVOCATE) v. REP BY ITS SECRETARY
Case at a glance
- Bench
- B M SHYAM PRASAD
- Neutral citation
- 2024:KHC:46294
Outcome
Dismissed
Therefore, the petition stands dismissed as
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 226, 227, 285
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. UNION OF INDIA DEPARTMENT OF TELECOMMUNICATION NEW DELHI - 110001 REP BY ITS SECRETARY. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.RAHUL CARIAPPA, AGA FOR R1 & R2; SRI. B.R. VIVEK, ADVOCATE FOR R3 AND R4; VIDE ORDER DATED 06.01.2023 R5 IS DELETED) THIS W.P IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES…
Judgment
(BY SRI. Y HARIPRASAD.,ADVOCATE) …PETITIONER AND:
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY THE SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE VIDHANA SOUDHA DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU - 560001. Digitally signed by ANAND N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
THE HONBLE MINISTER FOR DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU - 560001. - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC:46294 WP No. 14100 of 2019
THE COMMISSIONER BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, N R SQUARE BENGALURU - 560002.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (REVENUE) BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, N R SQUARE BENGALURU - 560002.
Operative part
UNION OF INDIA DEPARTMENT OF TELECOMMUNICATION NEW DELHI - 110001 REP BY ITS SECRETARY. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.RAHUL CARIAPPA, AGA FOR R1 & R2; SRI. B.R. VIVEK, ADVOCATE FOR R3 AND R4; VIDE ORDER DATED 06.01.2023 R5 IS DELETED) THIS W.P IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE PROPERTIES (LAND AND BUILDINGS) BELONGS TO CENTRAL GOVERNMENT IN OCCUPATION OF THE PETITIONER ARE EXEMPTED FROM THE PAYMENT OF PROPERTY TAX OR SERVICE TAX AS PER ARTICLE 285 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA AND ANY DEMAND IN RELATION TO THE SAME, ULTRA VIRES TO THE CONSTITUTION PROVISIONS OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA; DIRECT TO THE RESPONDENTS NOT TO COLLECT THE MUNICIPAL - 3 - NC: 2024:KHC:46294 WP No. 14100 of 2019 PROPERTY TAX TO-DAY AND WITHOUT COLLECTING THE MUNICIPAL PROPERTY TAX TRANSFER THE DOT PROPERTIES IN THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER BSNL IMMEDIATELY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD ORAL ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo to withdraw the petition in the light of certain decision taken by the BSNL. Therefore, the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE SA ct:sr
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Therefore, the petition stands dismissed as
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 226, 227, 285.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.