✦ Karnataka High Court · 15 Apr 2026

VISION INDIA PUBLIC SCHOOL v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

Case Details Karnataka High Court · 15 Apr 2026
Court
Karnataka High Court
Case No.
Writ Petition No. 9685 of 2025
Decided
15 Apr 2026
Length
1,110 words

Summary

A structured summary for this judgment hasn’t been prepared yet. The full text is below.

Precedent status

No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.

Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.

Why is this linked?

Original judgment text

SRINIVASAPURA, KOLAR DISTRICT Digitally signed by NAGARAJA B M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2026:KHC:20773 WP No. 9685 of 2025 HC-KAR KOLAR - 563135. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NAVYA SHEKAR, AGA) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R4 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS DATED 06/10/2023, 18/12/2023, 23/01/2024, 15/07/2024 AND 07/10/24 I.E. ANNX-D1, D2, D3, D4, E1 AND E2 RESPECTIVELY AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM ORAL ORDER Captioned petition is filed seeking following reliefs: "a) To issue a writ of mandamus directing the Respondent No.4 consider representations Dt. 06-10-2023, 18-12-2023, 23-01-2024, 15-07-2024 & 07-10-2024 i.e., ANNEXURE-D1, D2, D3, D4, E1 & E2 respectively; b) To issue a writ of mandamus directing the Respondent No.2 consider representations Dt. 05-11-2025, 03-01-2025 & 05-02-2025 i.e., ANNEXURE-F1, H & L respectively; - 3 - NC: 2026:KHC:20773 WP No. 9685 of 2025 HC-KAR c) To direct Respondent No.2 to 4 to restore the user ID and Password of the Petitioner and permit the Petitioner to apply for 4 pending installments RTE reimbursements for the academic year 2022-23, 2023-24 and 2024-25. d) To direct the Respondent No.4 to ensure the pending 4 installments of RTE reimbursement for the academic year 2022-23, 2023-24 and 2024-25 are paid to the Petitioner School; e) And to grant such other order or relief to which the Petitioner may be found entitled to under the circumstances of the case in the interest of justice."

2. The petitioner is an educational institution engaged in imparting education at the primary and secondary levels and is affiliated to the Central Board of Secondary Education. It is the specific case of the petitioner that, in strict compliance with the mandate contained under the Right of Children to Free and - 4 - NC: 2026:KHC:20773 WP No. 9685 of 2025 HC-KAR Compulsory Education Act, 2009 (for short, “RTE Act”) and the Karnataka Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Rules, the institution has admitted students belonging to the Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) to the extent of 25% of the intake. It is further averred that for the academic years 2022–23 and 2023–24, such admissions have been duly effected and, cumulatively, the petitioner–institution has imparted education to as many as 158 students under the said quota for the period from the academic year 2016–17 up to 2022–23.

3. The gist of the petitioner’s grievance is that, despite having submitted the online application seeking reimbursement of the second instalment under the RTE scheme for the academic year 2022–23, the same has not been released till date. It is contended that repeated representations have been submitted to the respondent– authorities, however, there has been inaction and palpable apathy in considering the same. It is in this backdrop that the petitioner has approached this Court seeking a writ in - 5 - NC: 2026:KHC:20773 WP No. 9685 of 2025 HC-KAR the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to release the reimbursement amount lawfully due.

4. Per contra, learned Additional Government Advocate, on instructions, would submit that certain discrepancies are noticed in the admissions made by the petitioner–institution and, therefore, the competent authority is required to verify and examine such discrepancies before processing and releasing reimbursement.

5. This Court, having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and having perused the material on record, finds that the petitioner–institution has placed on record documents indicating compliance with the statutory requirements under the RTE framework, including admission of students under the EWS quota and the corresponding entitlement for reimbursement.

6. The contention advanced by the respondents that discrepancies exist in the admission process cannot be - 6 - NC: 2026:KHC:20773 WP No. 9685 of 2025 HC-KAR countenanced as a ground to indefinitely withhold the reimbursement legitimately due to the petitioner. Under the scheme of the RTE Act, once students are admitted and education is imparted under the 25% reservation, the corresponding obligation is cast upon the State to ensure timely reimbursement. The authorities cannot, under the guise of “verification” or “discrepancies”, sit over the claim of the petitioner and delay the disbursement, thereby defeating the very object and intent of the welfare legislation.

7. It is trite that administrative authorities are under a bounden duty to act with promptitude and fairness, particularly in matters involving statutory entitlements. The inaction on the part of respondent No.4 in not adverting to the detailed representations submitted by the petitioner–institution clearly reflects administrative lethargy, warranting interference at the hands of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. This - 7 - NC: 2026:KHC:20773 WP No. 9685 of 2025 HC-KAR Court is therefore of the considered view that the present case is a fit case for issuance of a writ of mandamus.

8. Accordingly, for the foregoing reasons, this Court proceeds to pass the following: ORDER (i) The writ petition is hereby allowed; (ii) A writ in the nature of mandamus is issued directing respondent No.4 consider representations submitted by the petitioner, as indicated in prayer column (a), and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, after duly verifying the records relating to admissions made under the RTE quota; (iii) The aforesaid exercise shall be completed within an outer limit of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order; - 8 - NC: 2026:KHC:20773 WP No. 9685 of 2025 HC-KAR (iv) It is made clear that the respondents shall not withhold reimbursement on untenable or extraneous grounds and shall process the petitioner’s claim in a time-bound manner; (v) Liberty is reserved to the petitioner–institution to raise fresh bills for reimbursement pertaining to the academic years subsequent to 2023, accordance with law. Sd/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE ALB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 22

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 9685 of 2025). ← Search more judgments