✦ Karnataka High Court

AJIT SINGH BHANDARI v. BANGALORE INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AREA

RSA No. 1768 of 2021ASHOK S KINAGI3 min read

Case at a glance

Outcome

Withdrawn

The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 1010. MR. H.S BEDI, S/O MR. I.S.BEDI, AGED BOUT 61 YEARS, R/AT NO.I-77, DIAMOND DISTRICT, OLD AIRPORT ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 008. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI NARAYANA KUMAR V.J., ADVOCATE FOR C/R3) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 R/W ORDER XLII OF CPC AGAINST THE…

Judgment

AJIT SINGH BHANDARI, AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS S/O LATE MR. I.S.BHANDARI, R/AT NO.06, EASTERN AVENUE, GROUND FLOOR, (REAR SIDE), MAHARANI SINGH, NEW DELHI - 110 065. REPRESENTED BY HIS SON AND G.P.A. HOLDER, MR.ARJUN SINGH BHANDARI, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, RESIDING AT T-04, "VERVE ON THE CURVE", THIRD FLOOR, ECC ROAD, OUTER CIRCLE, CORNER, WHITEFIELD, BANGALORE - 560 066. (BY SRI. VIVEKANANDA, ADVOCATE FOR SMT. GANGABAI V, ADVOCATE) AND:

1.

BANGALORE INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AREA PLANNING AUTHORITY (BIAAPA), 333/1, 1ST FLOOR, V.J. COMPLEX, SULIBELE ROAD, DEVANAHALLI TOWN, BANGALORE RURAL - 562 110. …APPELLANT Digitally signed by B VEENA KUMARI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC:50076 RSA No. 1768 of 2021

2.

ASSISTNAT DRIECTOR BANGALORE INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AREA PLANNING AUTHORITY (BIAAPA) 333/1, 1ST FLOOR, V.J.COMPLEX, SULIBELE ROAD, DEVANAHALLI TOWN, BANGALORE RURAL - 562 110.

3.

M/S BHANDARI CONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPER PRIVATE LIMITED, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.809, 91, BHANDARI HOUSE, NEHRU PLACE, NEW DELHI - 110 019, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, MR. ANGAD SINGH BEDI.

4.

MR ANGAD SINGH BEDI, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, S/O JASJIT SINGH BEDI, AT NO.95, GOLF LINKS, NEW DELHI - 110 003.

5.

MR AMRIK SINGH BHANDARI, S/O LATE MR. I.S. BHANDARI, AGED ABOUT 90 YEARS, R/AT NO.B-88, GREATER KAILASH-I, NEW DELHI - 110 048.

6.

MR. M.S.PURI, S/O LATE S.GURMUKH SINGH PURI, AGED ABOUT 90 YEARS, R/AT SECTOR-7, BUNGALOW 289, PANCHKULA, HARYANA - 134 109.

7.

MR. D S. LAMBA, S/O MR.KULDEEP SINGH LAMBA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/AT NO.7, GREEN PARK, NEW DELHI - 110 016. - 3 - NC: 2024:KHC:50076 RSA No. 1768 of 2021

8.

MR. G.S.LAMBA, S/O MR.KULDEEP SINGH LAMBA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/AT NO.7, GREEN PARK, NEW DELHI - 110 016.

9.

M/S. BHANDARI BUILDERS PRIVATE LIMITED, A PRIVATE LIMITED COMPANY, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.809, 91, BHANDARI HOUSE, NEHRU PLACE, NEW DELHI - 110 019, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

Operative part

10.

MR. H.S BEDI, S/O MR. I.S.BEDI, AGED BOUT 61 YEARS, R/AT NO.I-77, DIAMOND DISTRICT, OLD AIRPORT ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 008. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI NARAYANA KUMAR V.J., ADVOCATE FOR C/R3) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 R/W ORDER XLII OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 13.01.2021 PASSED IN RA.No.15037/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE V ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, DEVANAHALLI, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE ORDER DATED 12.03.2019 PASSED ON IA IN OS No.263/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DEVANAHALLI, ALLOWING THE IA FILED UNDER ORDER VII RULE 11(a) AND (d) OF CPC FOR REJECTION OF PLAINT. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI - 4 - NC: 2024:KHC:50076 RSA No. 1768 of 2021 ORAL JUDGMENT After hearing the matter for sometime, learned counsel for the appellant files a memo seeking leave of the court to withdraw the appeal with a liberty to file a suit on the same cause of action. Memo is placed on record. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE DS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. RSA No. 1768 of 2021). ← Search more judgments