PRABHU KUMAR v. STATE OF KARNATAKA
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Hence, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-
Provisions considered
Judgment
(BY SRI. MOHAMED ZULFIKHAR AHAMED.,ADVOCATE) AND:
STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE S.H.O., J.C.NAGAR POLICE STATION BENGALURU REPRESENTED BY THE STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDING ANNEXE BENGALURU - 560 001. - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC:12677 CRL.P No. 4500 of 2018
SMT. VENKATALAKSHMI @ LUDHIAMMA W/O P SOMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/AT NO. 21, 7TH CROSS, KEMPAIAH BLOCK, J.C.NAGAR MUNIREDDY PALYA BENGALURU - 560 006. (BY SRI. CHANNAPPA ERAPPA., HCGP FOR R1; SMT. THULASI .K .,ADVOCATE FOR R2) …RESPONDENTS THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR IN CR.NO.175/2014 OF THE RESPONDENT NO.1 POLICE REGISTERED AGAINST THE PETITIONERS AND QUASH THE CHARGE SHEET IN C.C.NO.26898/2015 PENDING ON THE FILE OF VIII ADDL.C.M.M., BENGALURU FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 504 AND 506 R/W 34 OF IPC AND ETC. THIS CRIMINAL PETITION, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL FOR NON-PROSECUTION, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER
Operative part
1. Despite the order dated 13.3.2024 none appears for the petitioner today also. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. Hence, the writ petition stands dismissed for non- prosecution.
2. Registry is directed to communicate the above order to the trial Court. SR/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 14 Sd/- JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Hence, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482; Indian Penal Code, 1860.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.