✦ Karnataka High Court

SRI NATARAJA v. SRI B RAJAGOPAL

Criminal Revision Petition No. 39 of 2016

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

Accordingly, revision petition is dismissed for non prosecution

Judgment

Operative part

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JULY, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.39 OF 2016 BETWEEN: SRI NATARAJA S/O NAGAMANGALADA RAMAKRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/AT P. RANGANATHAPURA VILLAGE, VIJAYAPURA HOBLI, DEVENAHALLI TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-562 110. (BY SRI R SHAMA, ADVOCATE -ABSENT) …PETITIONER AND: SRI B RAJAGOPAL S/O BASAPPA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/AT ANDRAHALLI VILLAGE CHANNARAYAPATNA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-562 110. (BY SRI N SONNE GOWDA, ADVOCATE) …RESPONDENT THIS CRL.RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER PASSED BY THE ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, AT DEVANAHALLI IN C.C.NO.847/2013, DATED 17.06.2015 AND SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER PASSED BY THE V ADDL. DIST. AND S.J., DEVANAHALLI IN CRL.A.NO.15005/2015. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: Digitally signed by R MANJUNATHA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC:26560 CRL.RP No. 39 of 2016 ORDER None present on behalf of the revision petitioner. Revision petition is of the year 2016. Accused has suffered an order of conviction for the offence punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, confirmed by the First Appellate Court. The matter was listed and there was no representation on behalf of the revision petitioner on earlier occasions. Accordingly, revision petition is dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- JUDGE MR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 61

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, revision petition is dismissed for non prosecution

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 397; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — s. 138.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Criminal Revision Petition No. 39 of 2016). ← Search more judgments