✦ Karnataka High Court

THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER v. SRI H. M BHADRAIAH

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of the Joint

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 22. After negotiations, the parties have arrived at settlement. Accordingly, both the parties have filed a Joint Memo duly signed before the Lok Adalath. The said Joint Memo reads as follows : "The WP filed against the award in ID.No.280/2014 dated 12.11.2020 on the file…
  • Para 33. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of the Joint Memo modifying the Award dated 12.11.2020 passed by the Industrial Tribunal, Bangalore in I.D. No. 280/2014 vide Annexure ‘C’. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER 4 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE,BENGALURU BEFORE THE HIGH…

Judgment

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. SUNIL DUTT YADAV & SRI. MALLAIAH M.R., MEMBER W.P. No.12557/2021 (L-KSRTC) (Lok Adalat No.3694/2024) BETWEEN: 1 . THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER KSRTC, BENGALURU CENTRAL DIVISION, K. H. ROAD, BANGALORE-560 027. 2 . MANAGING DIRECTOR KSRTC, CENTRAL OFFICE, K H ROAD, BANGALORE-560 027. REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF LAW OFFICER, KSRTC, CENTRAL OFFICES, SHANTHI NAGAR, BENGALURU-560 027. (By Smt. LALITA P MANIHAL, ADVOCATE) ...PETITIONERS AND: 1 . SRI H. M BHADRAIAH MAJOR, OCC: WORKMAN, NO.84, 5TH MAIN ROAD, 5TH CROSS, CPV BLOCK, 2 GANGANAGAR, BANGALORE-560 032 REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, KSRTC EMPLOYEES UNION, CENTRAL DIVISION, BANGALORE. (By Sri. SHEKAR L, ADVOCATE) ...RESPONDENT THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION, QUASHING THE AWARD DATED 12.11.2020 PASSED BY THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE IN I.D. NO.280/2014, PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-C AND ETC. THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED: CONCILIATION ORDER In this petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the Award dated

12.11.2020 passed by the Industrial Tribunal, Bangalore in I.D. No. 280/2014 vide Annexure ‘C’.

#2. After negotiations, the parties have arrived at settlement. Accordingly, both the parties have filed a Joint Memo duly signed before the Lok Adalath. The said Joint Memo reads as follows : "The WP filed against the award in ID.No.280/2014 dated 12.11.2020 on the file of the Industrial Tribunal, Bangaluru has been settled between the 3 parties on the following terms and the award may kindly be modified as under:

#1. The basic pay of the Respondent is reduced by two incremental stage without cumulative effect. However, no arrears will be paid till the date of settlement.

#2. The suspension period is treated as not on duty.

#3. The parties to the proceedings have agreed for the above terms. The parties to this petition have set their hands to this settlement before the Lok Adalat in the presence of Conciliators on this 14.12.2024 at Bengaluru Bench."

#3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of the Joint Memo modifying the Award dated 12.11.2020 passed by the Industrial Tribunal, Bangalore in I.D. No. 280/2014 vide Annexure ‘C’. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER 4 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE,BENGALURU BEFORE THE HIGH COURT LOK ADALAT WP.NO. 12557/2021 (LOK ADALATH NO. 3694/2024) FILED BEFORE LOK ADALAT BETWEEN: The Divisional Controller, KSRTC AND: Sri. H.M. Bhadraiah …Petitioner …Respondent JOINT MEMO The WP filed against the award in ID.No.280/2014 dated 12.11.2020 on the file of the Industrial Tribunal, Bangaluru has been settled between the parties on the following terms and the award may kindly be modified as under:

#1. The basic pay of the Respondent is reduced by two incremental stage without cumulative effect. However, no arrears will be paid till the date of settlement.

#2. The suspension period is treated as not on duty.

#3. The parties to the proceedings have agreed for the above terms. The parties to this petition have set their hands to this settlement before the Lok Adalat in the presence of Conciliators on this 14.12.2024 at Bengaluru Bench. Sd/- Sd/- SIGNATURE OF PETITIONER SIGNATURE OF RESPONDENT/S Sd/- Sd/- ADVOCATE FOR PETITIONER ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT/S

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of the Joint

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India — arts. 226, 227.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.

Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments