SRI. RAJU v. SRI. K.B. RAGHURAM
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Amount agreed to be paid by the revision petitioners as per joint memo has to be paid to the complainant. After payment of the compensation amount as agreed in the joint memo, the amount of Rs.5,000/- imposed by the Trial Magistrate, confirmed by the…
Judgment
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 32 OF 2016 C/W CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 31 OF 2016 IN CRL.RP No. 32/2016 BETWEEN: SRI. RAJU, S/O KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/AT NO.16, SNEHA APARTMENT, SSSIHMS STAFF QUARTERS, EPIP AREA, WHITEFIELD, BANGALORE-560 066. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMUEL S DANDIN, ADVOCATE) AND: SRI. K.B. RAGHURAM, S/O BYRAPPA, SINCE DEAD HIS LEGAL HEIR SMT. RAJESHWARI G., C/O SREENIVASA GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 146, 9TH MAIN, 30FT ROAD, J.C. NAGARA, KURUBARAHALLI, BENGALURU 560 86. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. H. SURESH, ADVOCATE) JUDGMENT DATED 30.11.2015 THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IN CRL.A.NO.524/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE LI ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND S.J., BANGALORE AND ALSO JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE DATED 29.04.2014 IN C.C.NO.35072/2010 PASSED BY THE XII A.C.M.M., BANGALORE AND DISMISS THE COMPLAINT OF THE RESPONDENT. Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC:46312 CRL.RP No. 32 of 2016 C/W CRL.RP No. 31 of 2016 IN CRL.RP NO. 31/2016 BETWEEN: SRI. JOICY RAJU, W/O RAJU, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/AT NO. 16, SNEHA APARTMENT, SSSIHMS STAFF QUARTERS, EPIP AREA, WHITEFIELD, BANGALORE - 560 066 ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMUEL S DANDIN, ADVOCATE) AND: SRI. K.B. RAGHURAM, S/O BYRAPPA, SINCE DEAD HIS LEGAL HEIR SMT. RAJESHWARI G., C/O SREENIVASA GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 146, 9TH MAIN, 30FT ROAD, J.C. NAGARA, KURUBARAHALLI, BENGALURU 560 86. (BY SRI. H. SURESH, ADVOCATE) ...RESPONDENT THE JUDGMENT THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE IN CRL.A.NO.521/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE LI ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND S.J., BANGALORE AND ALSO JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE DATED 29.04.2014 IN C.C.NO.35070/2010 PASSED BY THE XII A.C.M.M., BANGALORE AND DISMISS THE COMPLAINT OF THE RESPONDENT.
30.11.2015 DATED THESE PETITIONS, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA - 3 - NC: 2024:KHC:46312 CRL.RP No. 32 of 2016 C/W CRL.RP No. 31 of 2016 ORAL ORDER Joint memo is filed by the parties signed by counsel for revision petitioners and counsel for respondent, in both the cases.
Placing the joint memos on record, revision petitions stand disposed of.
Amount agreed to be paid by the revision petitioners as per joint memo has to be paid to the complainant. After payment of the compensation amount as agreed in the joint memo, the amount of Rs.5,000/- imposed by the Trial Magistrate, confirmed by the first appellate Court, defrayed towards State stands set aside, in both the cases. If the Revision Petitioners fails to make payment as per the joint memo, the order of the Trial Magistrate stands restored automatically, in both the cases. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE rs/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 48
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 397.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Karnataka High Court, on 29 Apr 2014. The bench was V SRISHANANDA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.