WP No. 7678 of 2026 · Karnataka High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 226, 227
Key paragraphs
- Para 77. Accordingly, the endorsement at Annexure-J is set aside. The matter is remitted to the respondent-BDA for fresh consideration as regards the representation of the petitioner at Annexure-E.
Judgment
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 7678 OF 2026 (LA-BDA) BETWEEN:
1. SRI VASANTH KUMAR S/O SRI KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/AT GANGADIPURA VILLAGE KODIGEHALLI POST YESHWANTHAPURA HOBLI BENGALURU NORTH TALUK - 560 091 (BY SRI. VASANTH KUMAR H.T., ADVOCATE) AND: … PETITIONER Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU - 560 001
THE COMMISSIONER THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BENGALURU-560 020 - 2 - NC: 2026:KHC:14338 WP No. 7678 of 2026 HC-KAR
THE ADDL. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BENGALURU - 560 020
THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BENGALURU NORTH BENGALURU - 560 020. … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. A.S. HARISH, AGA FOR R1; SRI G. LAKSHMEESH RAO., ADVOCATE FOR R2 TO R4) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ENDORSEMENT ISSUED BY THE R-3 VIDE NO. BDA/LAO/LAC/2025-26 VIDE ANNEXURE-J DATED 18.02.2026 AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV ORAL ORDER The petitioner has sought for setting aside of the endorsement dated 18.02.2026 at Annexure-J.
2. In terms of the endorsement at Annexure-J, pursuant to the notification, the award has been approved. It is further submitted that the authority intends to - 3 - NC: 2026:KHC:14338 WP No. 7678 of 2026 HC-KAR proceed further pursuant to the award being passed. It is further observed in the endorsement that possession has been taken.
3. The petitioner submits that in terms of the order in W.A.No.1783/2014 and connected matters, certain directions have been issued in the operative portion of the order and in terms of said directions, the petitioner had made representation to the respondent-BDA requesting for dropping of acquisition proceedings on the ground that the property is situated in the green belt and there is a building in the remaining extent of about 5 to 6 guntas.
4. The petitioner further submits endorsement at Annexure-J is a non-speaking order and does not make out any case for rejecting the application at Annexure-E, which is a representation made pursuant to the order in writ appeal.
Learned Counsel Sri.G.Lakshmeesh Rao, appearing for the respondent-BDA upon instructions submits that - 4 - NC: 2026:KHC:14338 WP No. 7678 of 2026 HC-KAR 18 meter road runs through the property of the petitioner and possession has been taken.
However, it must be noticed that directions in W.A.No.1783/2014 and connected matters confers certain rights on the land owners. The representation made pursuant to such directions requires order to be passed with reasons. The endorsement issued does not refer to such reasons.
Accordingly, the endorsement at Annexure-J is set aside. The matter is remitted to the respondent-BDA for fresh consideration as regards the representation of the petitioner at Annexure-E.
Needless to state, till such orders are passed, respondent-BDA may not demolish the property of the petitioner. All contentions are kept open. SD/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE NP
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.