✦ High Court of India

Writ Petition No. 7999 of 2025 · The High Court

Case Details

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:12153 WP No. 7999 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 7999 OF 2025 (T-IT) BETWEEN: SRI SHIVAPPA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS NO.1, MEGALAHATTI, RANGASAMUDRA POST, PAVAGADA 561202 PAN BSNPS7590H TUMKUR (D) 572101. (BY SRI. RAVI SHANKAR S V., ADVOCATE) …PETITIONER AND: 1. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1 AND TPS AAYAKAR BHAVAN, RAMAKRISHNANAGAR, KUNIGAL ROAD, RAMAKRISHNA NAGAR, TUMKUR 572103 2. NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, REPRESENTED BY ADDITIONAL/JOINT/DEPUTY/ ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/ INCOME TAX OFFICER, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, ROOM NO. 401, 2ND FLOOR, E-RAMP, JAWAHARLAL NEHRU STADIUM, DELHI 110003

Legal Reasoning

(BY SRI. E I SANMATHI, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2) …RESPONDENTS Digitally signed by LEELAVATHI S R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:12153 WP No. 7999 of 2025 THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED U/S 144 R.W.S 144B DTD. 28.02.2024 BEARING DIN. ITBA/AST/S/144/2022-23/1048350645(1) PASSED BY THE R-1 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2022-23 HEREIN MARKED AS ANNX-A AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR ORAL ORDER In this petition, petitioner seeks the following reliefs: “i) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the order passed U/s 144 r.w.s 144B dated 28/02/2024 bearing DIN: ITBA/AST/S/144/2023-24/1061748615(1) passed by the Respondent No. 1 for the assessment year 2022-23 herein marked as Annexure - A. ii) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the penalty order dated 29/06/2024 passed u/s 272A(1)(d) of the Act bearing DIN and Notice No. ITBA/PNL/F/272A(1)(d)/2024- 25/1066247475(1) by the Respondent No. 1 for the assessment year 2022-23 herein marked as Annexure - A1. iii) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the penalty order u/s 270A of the Act dated 29/06/2024 bearing ITBA/PNL/F/270A/2024-25/1066266862(1) DIN by No. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:12153 WP No. 7999 of 2025 the Respondent No. 1 for the assessment year 2022-23 herein marked as Annexure- A2. iv) And pass such other orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the interest of justice and equity.” 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents and perused the material on record. 3. A perusal of the material on record will indicate that aggrieved by the order dated 28.02.2024 passed by respondent No.1 under Section 144 read with Section 144B of the Income Tax Act, pursuant to which, respondent No.1 issued the impugned penalty order dated 29.06.2024 at Annexure-A1 passed under Section 272A(1)(d) of the Act and impugned penalty order dated 29.06.2024 at Annexure-A2 passed under Section 270A of the Act and as such, the petitioner is before this Court by way of the present petition. 4. In this context, it is pointed out that inability and omission on the part of the petitioner to submit replies to the notices issued by the respondents and to participate in the proceedings was due to bonafide and unavoidable circumstances and sufficient cause and consequently, the petitioner was not in a position to issue reply or appear before the respondents and - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:12153 WP No. 7999 of 2025 participate in the said proceedings. It is submitted that the petitioner has a good case to urge on merits and if one more opportunity is granted in favour of the petitioner, the petitioner would submit its reply along with the documents and participate in the proceedings and as such, it is necessary that the impugned orders / Notices at Annexures – A, A1 and A2 be set aside and the matter be remitted back to the respondents by providing one more opportunity to the petitioner to submit its reply to the notices and direct the respondents to proceed further in accordance with law. 5. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents submits that despite sufficient opportunity being granted in favour of the petitioner, the petitioner did not send its reply nor participated in the proceedings and consequently, the impugned order does not warrant interference by this Court and the petition is liable to be dismissed. 6. A perusal of the impugned order at Annexure – A will clearly indicate that the same was passed in the absence of the petitioner, who did not avail the opportunity provided by the respondent, who has proceeded to pass the impugned order. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances and specific - 5 - NC: 2025:KHC:12153 WP No. 7999 of 2025 assertions on the part of the petitioner that due to bonafide reasons, unavoidable circumstances and sufficient cause, the petitioner was not in a position to send reply enclosing documents and contest the proceedings and in order to provide one more opportunity to the petitioner, by adopting a justice oriented approach, I deem it just and appropriate to set aside the impugned order and remit the matter back to the respondents for reconsideration afresh in accordance with law after providing one more opportunity to the petitioner in this regard. 7.

Decision

In the result, I pass the following: ORDER (i) The impugned notice / orders at Annexures – A, A1 and A2 dated 28.02.2024, 29.06.2024 and 29.06.2024, respectively, are hereby set aside. (ii) Matter is remitted back to the stage of petitioner submitting reply to Show Cause Notice dated 27.06.2023 under Section 143 and to proceed further in accordance with law. (iii) Liberty is reserved in favour of the petitioner to file its reply, pleadings, documents, etc., before respondent No.1, who shall consider - 6 - NC: 2025:KHC:12153 WP No. 7999 of 2025 the same and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. (iv) All rival contentions are kept open and no opinion is expressed on the same. Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE MDS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 24

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments