SRI RAVI R @ CHINNAPPA GARDEN RAVI v. STATE OF KARNATAKA
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
Accordingly, petition is dismissed as withdrawn with
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Accordingly, petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Sd/- (S VISHWAJITH SHETTY) JUDGE SV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 37
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY CRIMINAL PETITION NO.3636 OF 2026 (439(Cr.PC) / 483(BNSS) BETWEEN: SRI RAVI R @ CHINNAPPA GARDEN RAVI S/O RANGASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/AT NO.38, 3RD CROSS, OPPOSITE MARAPPA GARDEN, BENSON TOWN BENGALURU CITY – 560 046. (BY SMT. ABHINAYA K., FOR SRI. HANUMANTHARAYA C H., ADVOCATES) …PETITIONER AND: STATE OF KARNATAKA BY KORAMANGALA POLICE STATION BENGALURU (REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,) HIGH COURT BUILDING, BENGALURU-560 001. (BY SMT. RASHMI JADHAV, ADDL.SPP) …RESPONDENT THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 439 CR.P.C (U/S 483 BNSS) PRAYING TO SUMMON THE MEDICAL RECORDS PERTAINING TO HIM IN THE CUSTODY OF THE PRISON AND ENLARGE HIM ON BAIL ON MEDICAL GROUNDS AS AFORESAID FOR A PERIOD OF 06 MONTHS OR AS THIS HONBLE COURT MAY DEEM FIT IN S.C.NO.1416/2021 ARISING OUT OF CR.NO.156/2021 OF KORAMANGALA P.S., PENDING BEFORE THE HON’BLE 66TH - 2 - NC: 2026:KHC:26451 CRL.P No. 3636 of 2026 HC-KAR ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS, BENGALURU, FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 302, 307, 143, 145, 147, 148, 120(B), 201, 35, 37 R/W 149 OF IPC, 1860, U/S 25(1)(1-B), 27(3) OF ARMS ACT, 1959. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to the petitioner to file regular bail application before the Trial Court.
The said memo is placed on record.
Operative part
Accordingly, petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Sd/- (S VISHWAJITH SHETTY) JUDGE SV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 37
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, petition is dismissed as withdrawn with
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 439; Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 483; Indian Penal Code, 1860; Arms Act, 1959.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.