Criminal Petition No. 2620 of 2024 · Karnataka High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Hence, the petition is dismissed
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 439
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 s. 379
Judgment
Operative part
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 2620 OF 2024 BETWEEN: SRI. L. S. LOKESH S/O. SIDDA NAYAKA, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, RESIDING AT LINGADANAHALLI VILLAGE, THARIKERE TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT PRESENTLY R/AT NO.46 8TH CROSS, MAHALAKSHMI LAYOUT, BENGALURU - 560 003 (IN JUDICIAL CUSTODY SINCE FROM 26.12.2023) (BY SRI. NAIK .N.R., ADVOCATE (VC)) AND: THE STATE OF KARNATAKA STATE BY V.V. PURAM POLICE STATION, MYSURU - 570 001 REPT BY THE KARNATAKA STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HON'BLE HIGH COURT COMPLEX BANGALORE - 560 001 (BY SMT. K.P. YASHODHA, HCGP) Location: high court of karnataka …PETITIONER …RESPONDENT THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 439 CR.PC PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN C.C.NO.70/2014 (FIR NO.5/2004) REGISTERED BY THE V.V. PURAM POLICE STATION, MYSURU, FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 379 OF IPC AND 86, 87 OF KARNATAKA FOREST ACT IN CR.NO.5/2004, PENDING ON THE FILE OF I ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM AT MYSURU. THIS CRL.P, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC:21619 CRL.P No. 2620 of 2024 ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking permission to retire from the case, as the case papers along with NOC are handed over to the relative of the petitioner. Memo is accepted. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to retire from the case. None appears for the petitioner. Hence, the petition is dismissed. Sd/- JUDGE SPV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Hence, the petition is dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 439; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — s. 379.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.