Kumari Nisha N Shetty v. Sri Raghavendra Nayaka H K
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint
Provisions considered
- Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 s. 173(1)
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER Rbv
Judgment
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE T.G.SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA & SMT. K.T. PREMALATHA, MEMBER M.F.A.No. 3024/2022 (MV) (Lok Adalat No. 1302/2024) BETWEEN Kumari Nisha N Shetty D/o Nityananda Shetty Aged about 28 years, R/at Idu At Post Minaje Eedu, Hosmar Udupi District -574 107 (BY SRI. JAGADEESH H T, ADVOCATE) ...Appellant AND 1 . Sri Raghavendra Nayaka H K S/o Kariya Nayaka Major, R/At No.37K, Ground Floor 13th Cross, 1st Block Rajajinagara Bengaluru -560010. 2 . The Manager United India Insurance Co Ltd 2 Divisional Office at IX Mithra Towers 10/4 Kasturba Road Bangalore-01. (BY SRI. K N SRINIVASA, ADVOCATE FOR R-2, NOTICE TO R-1 – D/W V.C.O. DATED 12.04.2023) …Respondents MFA FILED U/S.173(1) OF MV ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DT. 22.01.2021 PASSED IN MVC NO.5818/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE VIII ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSE JUDGE AND ACMM, MEMBER, MACT, BENGALURU, (SCCH-5), PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED: CONCILIATION ORDER The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant - Claimant is present. The learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent – Insurance Company along with its representative are present.
#2. After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. A joint memo signed by the learned advocate appearing for the appellant/claimant (being authorized by the appellant/claimant to sign) and the learned advocate appearing for the respondent-Insurance Company and its authorized officer is filed. The appellant-claimant has agreed to receive and the respondent-Insurance 3 Company has agreed to pay a lump-sum of Rs.2,20,000/- (Rupees Two Lakhs Twenty Thousand only), in addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim.
#3. The Respondent - Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within six weeks from the date of preparation of award, failing which the said amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% P.A. from the date of default, till the date of deposit.
#4. The entire enhanced compensation amount shall be released in favour of the appellant / claimant, on proper identification.
#5. This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER Rbv
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — s. 173(1).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.