✦ Karnataka High Court

M/S. SRI LAKSHMI SRINIVASA v. YES BANK LTD

WP No. 7510 of 2025ASHOK S KINAGI

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of as

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 11. Learned counsel for the petitioner filed a memo stating that the petitioner after filing the writ petition, approached the respondent for settlement and accordingly, the matter is settled and the entire payment of dues are paid and loan account is closed. Hence, the petitioner…
  • Para 44. Pending IA(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE SKS CT:KHV

Judgment

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 7510 OF 2025 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: M/S. SRI LAKSHMI SRINIVASA ROLLER FLOUR MILLS (PARTNERSHIP FIRM), REP. BY IT'S PARTNER, SRI. M.S. SURAJ, AGED 40 YEARS, R/O NO.76, MAGADI ROAD, KEMPAPURA AGRAHARA, BENGALURU-560023 …PETITIONER Digitally signed by SUNITHA K S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA (BY SRI. MALIPATIL P S., ADVOCATE) AND: YES BANK LTD AUTHORIZED OFFICER, PRESTIGE OBELISK, MUNICIPAL NO.3, GROUND FLOOR, KASTURBA ROAD, BENGALURU-560001. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. FRANCIS XAVIER, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1 IN CP No.4692/25 & R1) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO- QUASH THE ORDER DTD 21.02.2025 PASSED IN S.A NO. - 2 - NC: 2026:KHC:5985 WP No. 7510 of 2025 HC-KAR 590/2023 ON THE FILE OF DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU VIDE ANNX-G. DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF THE PETITIONER FOR ONE-TIME SETTLEMENT OF HIS LOAN ACCOUNT UNDER THE OTS SCHEME. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI ORAL ORDER

1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner filed a memo stating that the petitioner after filing the writ petition, approached the respondent for settlement and accordingly, the matter is settled and the entire payment of dues are paid and loan account is closed. Hence, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the petition as settled out of Court and prays to dispose of the petition.

2.

Memo is placed on record. - 3 - NC: 2026:KHC:5985 WP No. 7510 of 2025 HC-KAR

Operative part

3.

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of as settled out of Court.

4.

Pending IA(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE SKS CT:KHV

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of as

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India — arts. 226, 227.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. WP No. 7510 of 2025). ← Search more judgments