SRI NAVEEN KUMAR S B v. SRI MANOJ V BHARANI
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Hence, Civil Revision Petition stands dismissed for non
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Hence, Civil Revision Petition stands dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 05TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 461 OF 2018 (SC) BETWEEN: SRI NAVEEN KUMAR S B, S/O C BASAVARAJ, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/AT NO.F26/A2, 469/A2, 3RD CROSS, RAMANUJA ROAD, MYSURU-34. (BY SRI. PRATHEEP K C.,ADVOCATE) AND: SRI MANOJ V BHARANI, S/O B.VENKATSH, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/AT NO.26, “NANDANA” OMKAR NAGAR, 2ND MAIN, J.P.NAGAR, MYSURU-56. …PETITIONER …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. L RAJA & HANUMANTHAIAH.,ADVOCATE) THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 18 OF THE KARNATAKA SMALL CAUSE COURTS ACT 1964 R/W SEC.115 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 27.07.2018 PASSED IN SC.NO.144/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE JUDGEADDL.COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF MONEY. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:44705 CRP No. 461 of 2018 HC-KAR ORAL ORDER This Court, by the Order dated 27.11.2018 directed the revision petitioner to deposit Rs.30,000/-. Later on, matter was adjourned on 27.03.2019 and 12.07.2019 to comply the Order dated 27.11.2018.
#2. Till today, said order is not complied.
#3. Hence, Civil Revision Petition stands dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Hence, Civil Revision Petition stands dismissed for non
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 115.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.