✦ Karnataka High Court

M/S PARALYMPIC COMMITEE OF INDIA v. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR OF SOCIETIES

Case at a glance

Outcome

Withdrawn

Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 22. SRI. S.P. SANGWAN S/O LATE MANGE RAM, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/O 45A, KRISHNA NAGAR, STREET NO.1, SAFDARJUNG ENCLAVE, NEW DELHI - 110 029 (BY SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTAR, AGA FOR R1 SRI. VENKATESH R. BHAGAT, ADVOCATE FOR C/R2) …RESPONDENTS - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:48069…

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 7281 OF 2022 (GM-KSR) BETWEEN: M/S PARALYMPIC COMMITEE OF INDIA A SOCIETY REGISTERED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF KARNATAKA SOCIETIES REGISTRATION ACT,1960 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.25/1, 9TH CROSS, J.P.NAGAR, 2ND PHASE, BENGALURU - 560 078 AND CORRESPONDENCE OFFICE AT : 28, SPORTS AUTHORITY OF KARNATAKA BUILDING, SREE KANTEERAVA STADIUM, BENGALURU - 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY GENERAL MR.GURSHARAN SINGH, S/O LATE SHRI LAL SINGH AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, (BY SRI. SACHIN B.S., ADVOCATE) PETITIONER ARUNKUMAR M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AND: 1. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR OF SOCIETIES OFFICE OF DISTRICT REGISTRAR OF SOCIETIES AND DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO- OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, 3RD ZONE, 146, SAHAKARA SOUDHA, 8TH CROSS ROAD, MARGOSA ROAD, MALLESHWARAM, BENGALURU - 560 003

#2. SRI. S.P. SANGWAN S/O LATE MANGE RAM, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/O 45A, KRISHNA NAGAR, STREET NO.1, SAFDARJUNG ENCLAVE, NEW DELHI - 110 029 (BY SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTAR, AGA FOR R1 SRI. VENKATESH R. BHAGAT, ADVOCATE FOR C/R2) …RESPONDENTS - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:48069 WP No. 7281 of 2022 HC-KAR THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 05.03.2022 PASSED BY R1 AS PER ANNEXURE-A AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo of even date seeking withdrawal of the petition. Memo is taken on record. Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE List No.: 1 Sl No.: 41

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Registration Act, 1908; Constitution of India — arts. 226, 227.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.

Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. WP No. 7281 of 2022). ← Search more judgments