✦ Karnataka High Court

Sri. Rajendran S v. Anuradha Kiran Bettadapura

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 55. This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER Rbv

Judgment

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE T.G.SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA & SMT. K.T. PREMALATHA, MEMBER M.F.A.No. 4313/2021 (MV) (Lok Adalat No. 1363/2024) BETWEEN: Sri. Rajendran S. S/o Late Subbarayadu, Aged about 61 years, No.85, 7th Main, 11th Cross, HSR Layout, Bengaluru-560 102. ...APPELLANT (By Sri. K.V. Naik, Advocate) AND

#1. Anuradha Kiran Bettadapura W/o Kiran Seetharam Bettadapura, No.201, 99-10, Sri Rama Mandira Road, Basavanagudi, Bengaluru – 560 004. Owner of the vehicle bearing Reg. No. KA-05/GHZ-1473.

#2. The Manager, New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Issuing Office (671900), 2 Basavanagudi City (DO.X), No.52, 1st Floor, Vinaya Complex, Vanivilas Road, Opp. National College, Basavanagudi, Bengaluru-560 004, Policy No.67190031150100003539 Period date: 24.6.2015 to 23.6.2016. …RESPONDENTS (By Smt. Lata Prasad, Advocate for R-2) MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 31.01.2020 PASSED IN MVC NO. 5455/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDL. JUDGE & ACMM, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES (SCCH-13) AND MACT, BENGALURU, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED. CONCILIATION ORDER The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant - Claimant is present. The learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent – Insurance Company along with its representative are present.

#2. After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. A joint memo signed by the learned advocate appearing for the appellant/claimant (being authorized by the appellant/claimant to sign) and the learned advocate appearing for the respondent-Insurance Company and its authorized officer is filed. The 3 appellant-claimant has agreed to receive and the respondent-Insurance Company has agreed to pay a lump-sum of Rs.1,03,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Three Thousand only), in addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim.

#3. The Respondent - Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within six weeks from the date of preparation of award, failing which the said amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% P.A. from the date of default, till the date of deposit.

#4. The entire enhanced compensation amount shall be released in favour of the appellant / claimant, on proper identification.

#5. This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER Rbv

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — s. 173(1).

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.

Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments