✦ Karnataka High Court

Sri. H.R. Dharmendra v. Mr. Siddesh S

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 55. This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER Rbv

Judgment

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE T.G.SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA & SMT. K.T. PREMALATHA, MEMBER M.F.A.No. 2111/2014 (MV) (Lok Adalat No. 1442/2024) BETWEEN Sri. H.R. Dharmendra S/o Ramanaik, Aged about 41 years, Residing at No.25, Behind Mazidi, Narayanappa Building, Ashwathanagar, Geddalahalli, RMV II Stage, Bangalore-560 094. (BY SRI. M.R. KUMARA SWAMY, ADVOCATE) ...Appellant AND

#1. Mr. Siddesh S. S/o Siddappa, Major, Age not known, R/at No.457, 10th Cross, Annapurneshwari Nilaya, Maheshwari Nagar, Bangalore-560 057. 2 . Universal Sompo General Insurance Co Ltd., K.V.D. Towers, No 7/3, II Floor, Above Barclays Finance, Opp. 100 Feet Road, Old Madras Road, 2 Indira Nagara, Bangalore 560038. (BY SRI. B. PRADEEP, ADVOCATE FOR R-2, NOTICE TO R-1 – D/W V.C.O. DATED 31.07.2017) …Respondents MFA FILED U/S.173(1) OF MV ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DT. 02.09.2013 PASSED IN MVC NO.3135/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE XXII ADDL. SMALL CAUSES JUDGE & MEMBER, MACT, BANGALORE, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED. CONCILIATION ORDER The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant - Claimant is present. The learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent – Insurance Company along with its representative are present.

#2. After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. A joint memo signed by the learned advocate appearing for the appellant/claimant (being authorized by the appellant/claimant to sign) and the learned advocate appearing for the respondent-Insurance Company and its authorized officer is filed. The appellant-claimant has agreed to receive and the respondent-Insurance Company has agreed to pay a lump-sum 3 of Rs.70,000/- (Rupees Seventy Thousand only), in addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim.

#3. The Respondent - Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within six weeks from the date of preparation of award, failing which the said amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% P.A. from the date of default, till the date of deposit.

#4. The entire enhanced compensation amount shall be released in favour of the appellant / claimant, on proper identification.

#5. This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER Rbv

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — s. 173(1).

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments