(BY SRI. MOHAMMED MUJASSIM, PARTY-IN-PERSON) v. (BY MS. NILOUFER AKBAR, AGA)
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Cause title
SRI MOHAMMED MUJASSIM AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS S/O. MOHAMMED GHOUSE PEER, NO.10, 1ST CROSS, KEMPAIAH BLOCK, J.C. NAGAR, BENGALURU 560 006. AADHAR NO: 386522468092 PAN: ATLPM8948B PHONE NO: 8105547444 EMAIL ID: [email protected] (BY SRI. MOHAMMED MUJASSIM, PARTY-IN-PERSON) …PETITIONER
AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF LAW AND ORDER, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001.
2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA HOME DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE - 560 001. Digitally signed by NIRMALA DEVI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2026:KHC:14212-DB WP No. 6093 of 2026 HC-KAR REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY.
3. DEPARTMENT OF PROSECUTIONS AND GOVERNMENT LITIGATION OFFICE AT 6TH FLOOR, KHB COMPLEX, CAUVERY BHAVAN, KEMPEGOWDA ROAD, BENGALURU 560009 REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR OF PROSECUTIONS
4. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL AND INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE KARNATAKA STATE POLICE, POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BENGALURU 560001.
5. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, BANGALORE CITY, INFANTRY ROAD, BANGALORE 560 001
6. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE BENGALURU NORTH YESHWANTHPUR CIRCLE FLYOVER, YESHWANTHPUR, BENGALURU-560 012.
7. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE R. T. NAGAR POLICE STATION, R.T. NAGAR, BANGALORE-560 032
8. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER R. T. NAGAR POLICE STATION, R.T. NAGAR, BANGALORE-560 032. - 3 - NC: 2026:KHC:14212-DB WP No. 6093 of 2026 HC-KAR
9. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE BENGALURU EAST, HKP ROAD, SHIVAJINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 051.
10. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE BANASWADI SUB-DIVISION, K.G. HALLI BANGALORE-560 045
11. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER K.G. HALLI POLICE STATION, K.G. HALLI, BANGALORE-560 032.
12. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SP OFFICE, ASHOKA NAGAR, B. H. ROAD, TUMAKURU-572 103
13. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER TUMKUR WOMEN POLICE STATION RING ROAD, SETTIHALLI, TUMKUR 572101
14. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER TILAK PARK POLICE STATION 130/8, 1ST CROSS ROAD, VINOBHA NAGAR, KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD, JAYAPURA, TUMAKURU - 572 101
15. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, MYSURT CITY POLICE, OFFICE OF THE POLICE COMMISSIONER, LOKARANJAN MAHAL ROAD, DOORA, MYSURU-570 010.
16. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE FOR LAW AND
ORDER -
4 - NC: 2026:KHC:14212-DB WP No. 6093 of 2026 HC-KAR MIRZA ROAD, NAZARBAD MOHALLA, MYSORE CITY - 570 010.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE DEVARAJA DIVISION, HAMELTON BUILDING, LASHKAR MOHALLA, MYSORE 570 001
THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER WOMEN POLICE STATION, IRWIN ROAD, LASHKAR MOHALLA, MANDI MOHALLA, MYSURU - 570 001. (BY MS. NILOUFER AKBAR, AGA) …RESPONDENTS THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO STRICTLY IMPLEMENT THE JUDGMENT OF THE HONBLE SUPREME COURT IN LALITA KUMARI V. STATE OF UP 2014 (2) SCC 1. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE)
The petitioner has filed the present petition as a public interest litigation, inter alia praying that directions be issued to the respondents to implement the judgment of the Supreme Court in - 5 - NC: 2026:KHC:14212-DB WP No. 6093 of 2026 HC-KAR the case of Lalita Kumari Vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh and Others1. The petitioner prays that respondents be directed to issue binding circulars/instructions for registration of FIRs in cognizable offences.
In addition to the above, the petitioner also prays that the directions be issued for issuing SOPs and also for initiating disciplinary proceedings against officers who have declined or delayed registration of FIR.
The petitioner-in-person who is also an advocate, states that there are four instances as mentioned in the petition which highlight that the police authorities do not register the FIR when approached. He contends that in several cases, the police officials attempt to resolve the disputes by compelling the complainant to enter into a mediation. If the complainant does not agree, they manipulate the report to reflect the complainant as an accused.
We do not consider it apposite to entertain the present petition. It would not be apposite for this Court to issue directions for following the decision of the Supreme Court, considering that 1 (2014) 2 SCC 1 - 6 - NC: 2026:KHC:14212-DB WP No. 6093 of 2026 HC-KAR ratio of the decision of the Supreme Court is binding and there is no requirement for this Court to issue general directions reiterating the law. Second, that in the event, an FIR is not registered, the complainant has recourse to remedies under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita [BNSS]. Thus, there is no requirement to issue any blanket orders in this regard. And third, we do not consider it apposite to comment on the cases which are set out in the petition as the same appear to be live cases and the facts as asserted may be a matter of contestation.
We accordingly dispose of the present petition.
All pending applications are also disposed of. SD/- (VIBHU BAKHRU) CHIEF JUSTICE SD/- (C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE Vmb List No.: 2 Sl No.: 11
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.