PROPRIETOX v. RAVEENDRA B.S
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
In the light of the same, the petition is dismissed
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. In the light of the same, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (J.M.KHAZI) JUDGE SRK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 2632 OF 2022 (482(Cr.PC) / BETWEEN: 528(BNSS) R.VEENA ASHWATHANARAYAN PROPRIETOX VIGNESH UTILITY SERVICES, DOOR NO-101, GROUND FLOOR, 4TH BLOSSOM APARTMENTS, NO.65, 13TH CROSS, J.P.NAGAR, 3RD PHASE, BENGALURU-560075, REP BY ITS SPA HOLDER SRI KARUNAKARAN .G, S/O GOPAL NO-34, 1ST MAIN ROAD, SYNDICATE BANK BUILDING, SESHADRIPURAM, BENGALURU-560020. (BY SRI.PARTHASARATHI., ADVOCATE) AND: RAVEENDRA B.S. R/AT NO.2, GROUND FLOOR, ESCALLA PARK VIEW, 5TH CROSS, VENATADRI LAYOUT, BANNERGHATTA ROAD, J.P. NAGAR, BENGALURU-560076. Digitally signed by REKHA R Location: High Court of Karnataka …PETITIONER …RESPONDENT - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:19190 CRL.P No. 2632 of 2022 HC-KAR THIS CRL.P FILED UNDER SECTION 482 CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONBLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS INITIATED BY THE RESPONDENT AGAINST THE PETITIONER IN C.C.NO.2529/2022 PENDING BEFORE XII ADDITIONAL SCJ AND ACMM SCCH-8 AT BENGALURU CITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MS JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner is present through video conference.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking permission to withdraw the petition.
Operative part
In the light of the same, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (J.M.KHAZI) JUDGE SRK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In the light of the same, the petition is dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482; Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.