(BY SRI. K.L. SREENIVAS.,ADVOCATE) v. R8 , R10 D/W)
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
(BY SRI. K.L. SREENIVAS.,ADVOCATE) …PETITIONER NARAYANAPPA LAKSHMAMMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AND:
SMT.SHARADAMMA W/O LT MUNIVENKATAPPA AGED 57 YEARS
SMT. SAVITHA D/O LT MUNIVENKATAPPA W/O RAGHU AGED 32 YEARS BOTH ARE R/AT KALAHASTIPURA VILLAGE HUTHUR VILALGE KOLAR TQ AND DIST-563101.
MANJUNATHA S/O LT MUNIVENKATAPPA AGED 30 YERS
JAGADISH S/O LT MUNIVENKATAPPA AGED 28 YERS - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC:28696 CRP No. 116 of 2022 BOTH RESPONDENTS 3 AND 4 ARE R/AT AJJAPPANAHALLI VILLAGE, HURTHUR HOBLI, KOLAR TALUK & DISTRICT-563101.
SMT LAKSHMAMMA W/O LATE BYRAPPA AGED 67 YEARS
CHANDRASHEKAR S/O LT BYRAPPAA AGED 47 YEARS
SMT. MANJULA D/O LT BYRAPPAA W/O N NANJUNDEGOWDA AGED 42 YEARS R/A MARGALA VILALGE ROBERSTSON HOBLI BANGAREPT TQ-563114.
ROOPA W/O A M SURESH D/O LT BYRAPPA AGED 37 YEARS R/AT AJJAPPANAHALLI VILLAGE HUTHUR HOBLI KOLAR TQ AND DIST-563101.
SUMITHRAMMA W/O PATEL MUNISHA D/O LT BYRAPPA AGED 32 YEARS R/AT KURUBUT VILLAGE HUTHUR HOBLI KOLAR TQ AND DIST-563101.
VENKATAPPA S/O LT MUNISHAMAPPA AGED 72 YEARS
VEENA W/O LT A M GOPAL D/O LT BYRAPPA AGED 42 YEARS - 3 - NC: 2024:KHC:28696 CRP No. 116 of 2022
G A ABHISHEK S/O LT A M GOPAL AGED 22 YEARS RESPONDENTS 10 TO 12 ARE R/AT AJJAPPANAHALLI VILLAGE HUTHUR HOBLI KOLAR TQ AND DIST (BY SRI. THYAGARAJ M.,ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R4; V/O DATED 8.7.24 NOTICE TO R5 TO R7, R9, R11 & R12 D/W; R8 , R10 D/W) …RESPONDENTS THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF THE CPC PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS IN O.S.NO.421/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE HON’BLE III ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,KOLAR, AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED THEREIN ON 04.01.2022 REJECTING THE I.A.NO.5 AND THEREBY ALLOW THE I.A.NO.5 AS THE SAME IS QUITE ESSENTIAL AND NECESSARY IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS CRP, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ)
1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: a. Call for the records in O.S.No.421/2019 on the file of the Hon’ble III Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Kolar, and set aside the order passed therein on 04.01.2022 rejecting the I.A.No.5 and thereby allow the I.A.No.5 as the same is quite essential and necessary in the interest of justice and equity. - 4 - NC: 2024:KHC:28696 CRP No. 116 of 2022
2. On enquiry, both the counsels submit that the suit is posted for final arguments. If that be so, no purpose would be served in considering the above petition.
3. Reserving liberty to agitate all the grounds raised in the present petition, the above petition stands disposed of. Sd/- JUDGE LN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 91
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.