✦ Karnataka High Court

SMT. A. MANJULA v. List No.: 1 Sl No.: 52

Writ Petition No. 5856 of 2025CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA, EQUITY

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

SMT. A. MANJULA D/O PAPAMMA AND ANNAYYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/AT HULIMAVU VILLAGE AND POST, BANNERAGHATTA ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 076. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAMESH M.S, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. GIRISH, ADVOCATE) AND: SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka SRI. RAVIKIRAN S.K S/O KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS. R/AT SAMETHANAHALLI VILLAGE, ANUGONDANAHALLI HOBLI, HOSKOTE TALUK - 2 - NC: 2026:KHC:8712 WP No. 5856 of 2025 HC-KAR BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. …RESPONDENT (RESPONDENT SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 04/11/2024 PASSED ON I.A.NO.II IN M.C. NO.297/2021 PASSED BY THE 1ST ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, AT BENGALURU ANNEXURE-E AND AFTER PERUSING THE RECORDS OF THESE PROCEEDINGS BY CALLING THE SAME FROM THE RESPECTIVE COURT, AND CONSEQUENTLY QUASHING AN ORDER DATED 4/11/2024 PASSED ON IA NO.II IN M.C. NO.297/2021 AND PLEASED TO ENHANCE THE INTERIM MAINTENANCE AND GRANT SUCH OTHER RELIEFS AS THIS HONBLE COURT DEEMS FIT TO GRANT IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE AND IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA - 3 - NC: 2026:KHC:8712 WP No. 5856 of 2025 HC-KAR ORAL ORDER Sri. Ramesh M.S representing Sri. Girish learned counsel on record for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. Seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. Memo to that effect is also filed. Permission as prayed for is accorded. Writ petition is thereby dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (DR.CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE VS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 52

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 5856 of 2025). ← Search more judgments