SMT. SUNANDAMMA v. SHRI RANDEEP SINGH D
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
1. SMT. SUNANDAMMA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, W/O LATE A.P. SIDDARAMU.
2. A.S. NANDAKUMAR, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, S/O LATE A.P. SIDDARAMU. BOTH ARE RESIDENTS OF ADAHALLY VILLAGE, SARGUR HOBLI, H.D.KOTE TALUK, MYSORE DISTRICT - 570 001. …PETITIONERS Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA (BY SRI. SHIVARAMU H.C., ADVOCATE) AND:
SHRI RANDEEP SINGH D., THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (FOOD), MYSORE DISTRICT, MYSORE - 570 001.
THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES, MYSORE DISTRICT, MYSORE - 570 001. - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC:14181 WP No. 42191 of 2017
SHRI. NANJUNDAIAH, THASILDAR, H.D. KOTE TALUK, MYSORE DISTRICT - 570 001. (BY SRI. VIKRAM HUILGOL, AAG A/W SRI. K.P. YOGANNA, AGA FOR R2; R1 AND R3 ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) …RESPONDENTS THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED.23.8.2017 PASSED BY THE R-1 IN HIS ORDER VIDE ANNEXURE-F AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Mr.H.C.Shivaramu on instructions would submit that he would wish the petition and pursue the remedy as is available in law. - 3 - NC: 2024:KHC:14181 WP No. 42191 of 2017
2. Reserving liberty to the petitioner to knock at the doors of the appropriate forum, the petition stands disposed as withdrawn. Sd/- JUDGE List No.: 1 Sl No.: 41.2
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Karnataka High Court, on 23 Aug 2017. The bench was M NAGAPRASANNA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.