K SHANKARAPPA v. K THIRUMALESWARA BHATT
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
In view of the memo, appeal is dismissed as
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. In view of the memo, appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed.
Judgment
LAKSHMINARAYANA MURTHY RAJASHRI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA (BY SRI MANJUNATH L S, ADVOCATE) AND: K THIRUMALESWARA BHATT AGED 69 YEARS S/O K KESHAVA BHATT R/AT PERIADKA HOUSE SAVNOOR VILLAGE PUTTUR TALUK. …RESPONDENT THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 407 Cr.P.C. PRAYING FOR WITHDRAWAL OF C.C.No.61/2013 FROM THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C PUTTUR D.K., AND TO TRANSFER IT TO THE COURT OF THE C.M.M., BENGALURU CITY TO TRY WITH C.C.No.3587/2017 AND ETC., THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC:24871 CRL.P No. 1544 of 2024 ORDER
#1. Learned counsel for petitioner files a memo seeking withdrawal of the appeal. The memo reads thus: “Under signed counsel for the petitioner prays that this Hon’ble court be pleased to permit him to withdraw the matter as not pressed and my kindly be give liberty to file fresh petition and may kindly direct the office to handover the original documents as well as certified copies hence this memo for withdrawal as not press to meet the ends of justice and equity.”
#2. In view of the memo, appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed.
#3. Registry is directed to return the documents to the learned counsel for petitioner. Sd/- JUDGE LRS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 13
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the memo, appeal is dismissed as
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 407.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.