M/S. ORAIYAN GROUPS, A PARTNERSHIP FIRM, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.54, ”ELEGANT v. GANGADHAR MURTHY CHENNIGAPPA

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO.3094 OF 2026 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:

1. M/S. ORAIYAN GROUPS, A PARTNERSHIP FIRM, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.54, ” ELEGANT EMBASSY”, 12TH MAIN ROAD, 27TH CROSS ROAD, 4TH BLOCK JAYANAGAR, BANGALORE, KARNATAKA 560 011. REPRESENTED BY ITS LEGAL HEAD MR. NATESHA N. (BY SRI. SHREYAS S., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. S. SUDHARSAN, ADVOCATE) AND:

GANGADHAR MURTHY CHENNIGAPPA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, S/O LATE CHENNIGAPPA RESIDING AT NO.322, 3RD CROSS, 2ND BLOCK, 3RD STAGE, BASAVESHWARNAGAR, BENGALURU-560 079. …PETITIONER

IKON COMMERCIAL PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED, A COMPANY REGISTEREED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT 1956 HAVING CIN U70200KA2004PTC03 5273 HAVING REGISTERED OFFICE ADDRESS AT NO.322, 3RD ‘A’ CROSS - 2 - NC: 2026:KHC:19450 WP No. 3094 of 2026 HC-KAR 2ND BLOCK, 3RD STAGE BASAVESHWAR NAGAR BENGALURU, KARNATAKA-560079 REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR MR. GANGADHAR MURTHY CHENNIGAPPA DIN: 00808722 AND MRS. KUSUMA RAMAKRISHNA. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. D.R.RAVISHANKAR, SENIOR CONSEL FOR SRI. ABHISHEK HUDDAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING THE IMPUGNED COMMON ORDER DATED 09/01/2026 I.A.NO.1, 2 AND 3 PASSED BY THE LXXXII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU, IN COM.OS NO.1799/2025 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-E AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD ORAL ORDER

1. In this writ petition, the petitioner-plaintiff has called in question the order dated 09.01.2026 passed by the LXXXII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru (hereinafter referred to as ‘Trial Court’ for short) in Com.O.S.No.1799/2025, whereby the Trial Court has refused to pass any orders on I.A.Nos.1/2025 to 3/2025 filed by the plaintiff. - 3 - NC: 2026:KHC:19450 WP No. 3094 of 2026 HC-KAR

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as per their ranking before the Trial Court in Original Suit.

The petitioner–plaintiff filed a commercial suit for recovery of money. Along with the plaint, the plaintiff also filed I.A.No.1/2025 under Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 read with Section 151 of CPC; I.A.No.2/2025 under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 of CPC; and I.A.No.3/2025 under Order XXXVIII Rules 5 and 6 read with Section 151 of CPC. Since the Trial Court refused to pass any orders on the said applications, the petitioner is before this Court.

Learned senior counsel appearing respondents submitted that, after service of summons, the defendants-respondents have appeared through counsels and have filed a written statement before the Trial Court.