Judgment · High Court
Judgment
Judgment
in THE mon count or nm.A Ant T aR0ALO ATE)) Tb S HP Z5 DAY or MAY 2011 PRESENT THE HOW ALE MRS JUST! E AANJULA CRELL UK THE HOWSLE MIt JUSTICE S NSATYANARAYANA WRIT APPEAL NO 484912010 ( LAICIADS) S1 a I air hataimappa )Ot Maa Sf 1qat No CD? IN’ iangaidfl bU 075 2 a’ I açd shoal f, V(ars ,Jc l% h pnu’ / Manata Na, i17 Mrs Ira Ifl, ha s n y& (aS a /Sml NiNflA1’°A dva abj AND: < sank r & 5)P r t CepltID&U t kPfi I I 4NTS $° 14 ig r II T ( ‘i• $ a lb t l It ‘I S 1 2 K’n atoYA IndusIntil kit i HeY i patti k3oaM RashtrOth’ Binidii* NJ’ Road EIangaicVt Sni; 001. By its F atcutiw M whet 3 ‘he Lcd Aeq as he a Liii cv KINDB BMTCP, 3/2. KbenY tlu2ding, H’ 3angatOttOt0009 rusSc1andhirsagm M/ a. Nandi LouOrnw c rndut FnwiPriws Ltd, 6 nompaiit RcgtsieiFd audi. the A)wpauws Mt 1036 mid Having its Jthit I Ne. 1 Mfe Haideiits fff ML 2 Bangalort S6 001 LEN its MonogwLE Pvc It t M/s hanoi Iufrm4fli tan a fl Mi F,nteflnsi Ltd , a ampS a I igisif tO tither the € cups s (ci 13 , Javing its other a N ui N1 flo6Ji°t3 01 Mid,0th 3çyid, In R1S1nNM H Ariptsai pra) ng It, sit asi c the irde posset n i tel 0 M 20 1LA KIM S
#1. /2 1 ul t1i it2I Li lh& e w ? titian ‘ £ - I, epbRPppW)flfl)ScsU1OpaddYWit saps— *iapr01fl q2Wqa)MlEtOil paslWbTPP”°’tq. ipuaB(4yjJT4JS11l1•tb* ‘gaddtNI1SufiMiwpJaua 1a a —a’ * S S a ‘Pb 4OLit J4)iIs Is * I-, a.*5 N 41r
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.