SRI. KRISHNAMURTHY B K v. SRI NAGARAJU.N
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Hence, this Criminal Revision Petition is dismissed
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ss. 397, 401
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Hence, this Criminal Revision Petition is dismissed for non –prosecution. Sd/- (SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE DSP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 22
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No. 170 OF 2023 BETWEEN: SRI. KRISHNAMURTHY B K AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS S/O LATE B R KRISHNAPPA R/AT No. 251, HALBAVI ROAD NEXT TO BBMP OFFICE, VARTHUR BENGALURU – 560 087. (BY SMT. KAVITHA D, ADVOCATE – ABSENT) …PETITIONER AND: SRI NAGARAJU.N S/O L NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS R/AT No.31,23RD MAIN ROAD GIRINAGAR, 1ST BLOCK BENGALURU – 560 085. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. LOKESHA A N, ADVOCATE) THIS CRL.RP FILED UNDER SECTION 397 READ WITH SECTION 401 OF Cr.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 19.11.2022 PASSED BY LXIX ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE (CCH-70) BENGALURU IN CRL.A.NO.863/2020 AND SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND CONVICTION ORDER PASSED BY XVIII ACMM, BENGALURU IN C.C.No.6622/2017 DATED 11.11.2020. LAKSHMINARAYANA MURTHY RAJASHRI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:28490 CRL.RP No. 170 of 2023 HC-KAR THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner is absent.
Learned counsel for the petitioner made submission on 22.07.2025 that the matter is settled out of Court and she will withdraw the petition. On 23.07.2025, learned counsel for the petitioner again sought short accommodation. Today learned counsel for the petitioner is not present. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this matter.
Operative part
Hence, this Criminal Revision Petition is dismissed for non –prosecution. Sd/- (SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE DSP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 22
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Hence, this Criminal Revision Petition is dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — ss. 397, 401.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.