(BY SRI. RAGHAVENDRA RAO K.,ADVOCATE) v. CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT 577228
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
1. SMT. CHANDRIBAI W/O SRI SHIVAJI RAO, AGED 48 YEARS,
2. SMT AMBUBAI W/O SRI HANUMANTHA RAO, AGED 63 YEARS, BOTH ARE R/O MARSHETTY HALLI, BHADRAVATHI TALUK SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT 577301 (BY SRI. RAGHAVENDRA RAO K.,ADVOCATE) …PETITIONERS NARAYANAPPA LAKSHMAMMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AND:
UMESH K S/O LATE KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/O UDAVA VILLAGE, TARIKERE TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT 577228
NAGARAJA S/O LATE KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O AAGALAGANDI VILLAGE, KOPPA TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT 577126
SMT YELLUBAI W/O LATE KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 81 YEARS, - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC:20308 CRP No. 78 of 2024 R/O UDAVA VILLAGE, TARIKERE TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT 577228
SHIVAJIRAO S/O LATE KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/O MARASHETTYHALLI, BHADARAVATHI TALUK, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT 577233
SMT SAVITHRI BAI W/O LATE SHEKAR RAO, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/O YEREHALLI VILLAGE, BHADARAVATHI TALUK, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT 577245
PRADEEPA G S/O LATE HEMAVATHI, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,
AJAY G S/O LATE HEMAVATHI, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, RESPONDENTS 6 AND 7 ARE R/O BARANDURU VILLAGE, BHADRAVATHI TALUK, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT 577245
SMT SHOBHA BAI K W/O MURTHY RAO, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/O KALYANPURA VILLAGE BELURU TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT 573115.
RAMESH S/O LATE KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/O UDAVA VILLAGE, TARIKERE TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT 577228 …RESPONDENTS - 3 - NC: 2024:KHC:20308 CRP No. 78 of 2024 THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF THE CPC., PRAYING TO CALL FOR AND EXAMINE THE RECORDS IN O.S.NO.105/2021 PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE LEARNED PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT BHADRAVATHI AND FURTHER SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED BY THE LEARNED PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE IN O.S.NO.105/2021 ON I.A.NO.5 DATED 25.10.2023 AND ALLOW THIS CRP WITH COSTS AND GRANT SUCH OTHER RELIEFS AS THIS HON’BLE COURT DEEMS FIT TO GRANT IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS CRP, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER
1. The petitioners are before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: records
Call examine O.S.No.105/2021 pending on the file of the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge at Bhadravathi and further set aside the impugned order passed by the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge in O.S.No.105/2021 on I.A.No.5 dated 25.10.2023 and allow this CRP with costs and grant such other reliefs as this Hon’ble Court deems fit to grant in the circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice and equity.
2. After arguing for some time, the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the above petition with liberty to agitate all the issues raised in the above petition in the trial Court. - 4 - NC: 2024:KHC:20308 CRP No. 78 of 2024
3. Reserving such liberty, the above petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Pending IA stands disposed/dismissed. Sd/- JUDGE PRS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 71
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 115.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Karnataka High Court, on 25 Oct 2023. The bench was PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.