THE KARNATAKA MILK FEDERATION LTD v. SRI. I R RAMALINGE GOWDA
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
appellant, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
Judgment
Operative part
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.L.MANJUNATH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SURI APPA RAO W.A. No.16561/2011 (S-RES) BETWEEN : THE KARNATAKA MILK FEDERATION LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR IN-CHARGE, DR. M H MARIGOWDA ROAD BANGALORE-560 029 NOW REPRESENTED BY ITS ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR(ADMINISTRATION) ...APPELLANT ( By Sri. SAWAKAR, ADV. FOR M/S.SUNDARASWAMY & RAMDAS ) AND : 1 SRI. I R RAMALINGE GOWDA S/O LATE RAJU, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS MANAGING DIRECTOR WORKING AS MANAGING DIRECTOR KARNATAKA MILK FEDERATION, DR M H MARIGOWDA ROAD, BANGALORE- 560 029, AND RESIDING AT NO.737/A, 2ND MAIN, KALYAN CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING LAYOUT, JNANABHARATHI POST, BANGALORE – 560 056. 2 3 4 5 - 2 - STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATION M S BUILDING, BANGALORE- 560 001 REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES IN KARNATAKA, NO.1, ALI ASKAR ROAD, BANGALORE- 560 001 UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE,, KRISHI BHAVAN, NEW DELHI – 110 001. SRI A S PREMNATH MAJOR, MANAGING DIRECTOR-IN-CHARGE, KMF LIMITED, DR. M H MARIGOWDA ROAD, BANGALORE-560 029. ...RESPONDENTS ( By M/S. SUBBA RAO & CO., ADV. FOR C/R-1, SRI. M. KESHAVA REDDY, AGA FOR R-2 & R-3, SRI. KALYAN BASAVARAJ, ASG FOR R-4, SRI. ASHOK HARANAHALLI, SENIOR COUNSEL APPEARING FOR SRI. P.N. MANOHAR, ADV. FOR R-5) This Writ Appeal is filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961, prays that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to set aside the order dated 06.09.2011 passed in W.P. No.24259/2011 and dismiss the writ petition filed by the respondent No.1. This Writ Appeal coming on for Orders this day, K.L.MANJUNATH. J., delivered the following : - 3 - JUDGMENT In view of the Memo filed by the learned Counsel for the appellant, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- JUDGE. Sd/- JUDGE. Rbv*
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.