B.S. PARAPPA v. KRISHNA
Case at a glance
- Bench
- S VISHWAJITH SHETTY
- Neutral citation
- 2024:KHC:10371
Outcome
Withdrawn
2, Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
Judgment
Operative part
B.S. PARAPPA, S/O SHIVANNA, NOW AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, MERCHANT AND AGRICULTURIST, R/AT BOMMANAPALYA, SOMMENAHALLI POST, SRIRAMPURA HOBLI, HOSADURGA TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577 527. (BY SRI. K.A. CHANDRASHEKARA, ADVOCATE) AND: …PETITIONER KRISHNA KUMAR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA C.S. SHANTHAKUMAR, S/O SAMPANGIRAMAIH, NOW AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, MERCHANT, B.H. ROAD, CHIKKANAYAKANAHALLI TOWN, TUMAKURU DISTRICT - 572 24. …RESPONDENT (NOTICE NOT ORDERED IN RESPECT OF RESPONDENT) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.PC PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 20.01.2024 PASSED IN C.C.NO.76/2017 PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE LEARNED PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C CHIKKANAYAKANAHALLI ON AN APPLICATION FILED UNDER - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC:10371 CRL.P No. 1157 of 2024 SECTION 45 OF INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT PENDING FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 45 OF INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT PENDING FOR THE OFFENCE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 138 OF NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT AND ALLOW THE APPLICATION FILED UNDER SECTION 45 OF INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT AS PRAYED FOR. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the petition. The said submission is placed on record. 2, Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. SD/- JUDGE NSU List No.: 1 Sl No.: 76 CT: BHK
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: 2, Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482; Indian Evidence Act, 1872 — s. 45; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — s. 138.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.