✦ Karnataka High Court · 05 Jun 1998

Karnataka High Court · 1998

A SADASHIVA5 min read

Judgment

I IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF JUNE 1998 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE A J. SADASHIVA WRIT PETITION NO2O687/l992 BETWEEN: eikk nm aged EN y&dE t g a Nt Eta ea, ge 42 >‘e c MorNtppa • e 4 16 iremappa aged 36 7ea 3 a

8.

Padrpaeetbi igcd 26 yC a. 6 L 04 lahutha, agtci 2a yeas, t g a U CS! . Jrc of 4iu1aa3a1iippJ> iI!&e. PUNtcodiabady, Puttur To. [ t Disar t 61 J I )NEF 4 1! 1 e t. ( f p. r cia J AN? Er 44J Er ‘I! ‘ £ 6? ,Tc3TT, g N Me °c a Er€tt Votiaopa Shetty. aarEr 4& years, TOt aleth-<, uged uhnt 22 cears. EaPONuENPI I UN iC. . I 0 C 0 -n 7 z 0 C -4 -n 7 Z 7 I I 8 -n 7 z C C 0 I S 0 I 1 ( 8 C 0 7 7 C) I 8 C 0 a 7 - I C - F l - I C f t f tE f t f t — : 2 : s o ’ - ’ F . 3 - — J — l C L 3 - - 4 - • — t _ ì L _ 1 - L - 4 f t F — — 7 I F • C - I f t f t C L I f t f t . ’ f t 2 3 - - - F t f t - l I f t 4 — - ‘ 3 : ) F - f t f t f t ‘ f t I : 3 - 0 C F 3 3 - - 1 - - - f t f t t4 f f t . f t : 4 f t 4 . f t - j 4 - — f t F ) f t E < 2 : ) f t F ) 4 — C f t 4 — ’ I F 2 : 2 C , — F ) I C ’ - 4 - f t 1 2 : , 4 — - 4 C ’ — - - ‘ f t -4 4 0 2 I F — - — 4 ( 3 _ F 0 3 : 4 - 3 F - 1 - - 4 F 2 : 4 - — F - 2 : ’ f t 0 C L : 1 ) C , - 4_ F 4 - - ) - 4 - f t 3 - F C - 4 - 3 - 1 3 — F — 4 - 1 2 ) 1 F - 7 I 4 - ) 2 : ) 1 f t C — I F C f t C r f t 1 - - I 4 - ‘ - c - 3 f t f t j- F f t 4 — - 7 - 3 — - - f t H 4 - 4 4 . L 2 : & H- 4 f t 4 - 2 : — ‘ F F - 34 - - 4 - - - ( 3 4 — - 1 £ 2 : f t 4 - f t F 2 : F ) F • 4 . - f t - 2 : 2 : 2 4 - 3 : F f t ‘ - 4 F l ’ ) 2 : - 2 : — 3 ‘ O - • - ‘ H - 4 - 4 l I f t - 4 • : F l l E 3 ‘ O F l f t - - - i 4 - — 0 If t - C C ) 1 2 ‘ . F ’ f t - ì ‘ - - 4 - f t f t ) - 4 - 4 c F F 4 7 : 3 - L4 % L b 8 H C O U R T O F K A R N A T A K A I H G H C O U R T O F K A R N A T A K A I H G H C O U R T O F K A R N A T A K A I H G H C O U R T O F K A R N A T A K A I H G H C O U R T O F K A R N A T A K A * C O U R T O F K A R N A T A K A ‘ 4 ’ G - C O U R T O F ‘ C A R N A T A K A f l O p . C O U R T O F K A R N A T A K A ‘ 4 I G r : o u w ’ O F C A R N A 4 % 4 - e G ’ t O U R ? 0 “ A ? % A f l : 6 G H C O U R T O F K A R N A T A K A I H G H C O U R T O F K A R N A T A K A H G H C O U R T C F K A R N A T A K A H G H C O U R T O F K A R N A T A K A i H G H C O U R T O F A R N A T A K A teasel So a i t r d tht.ir t&our rtaast. dtlCfl at huaband of t1rt eacdrt c upr re’;& L teThr t u tao c tI etitioners As the urder rs not chaitenged h the Lan titsnae it is i ut orct t rv ç - u S It. it. Ei c 3 The pet tion th efor , f - id i -o A rely F ;ed :t, tn th rue s- f t ci h St C c 0 t ‘41 TTtrmnn 0 0 C 0 Xe I a 8 C Or z I a I n 0 C 0 I 0 2: n 0 C 0 1

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments