MR. ABDUL AZEEZ KHAN @ SAIF KHAN v. MOHAN
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, the Revision Petition is dismissed as
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. The memo is taken on record. Accordingly, the Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. All IAs., in this Revision Petition shall stand closed. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE SSB CT: BHK
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 26 OF 2023 BETWEEN: MR. ABDUL AZEEZ KHAN @ SAIF KHAN S/O LATE SALEEM KHAN, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.2947, SHACKOOR FURNITURES, 3RD CROSS, LAKSHAR MOHALLA DAWOOD KHAN STREET MYSORE - 560 001. (BY SRI. SUNIL KUMAR H, ADVOCATE) AND: …PETITIONER MOHAN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA SMT. MUSKAN W/O ABDUL AZEEZ KHAN @ SAIF KHAN AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.217, 2ND CROSS BDA LAYOUT, JAYNAGAR 1ST BLOCK EAST, BYRASANDRA, BANGALORE - 560 011. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. SYED ALEEMULLA, ADVOCATE) THIS RPFC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURT ACT AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 04.02.2022 PASSED IN C.MISC.No.2/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, BENGALURU, - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:29895 RPFC No. 26 of 2023 HC-KAR PARTLY ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 125 OF Cr.P.C. FOR MAINTENANCE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI ORAL ORDER A memo is filed seeking permission to withdraw this Revision Petition.
#2. The memo is taken on record. Accordingly, the Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. All IAs., in this Revision Petition shall stand closed. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE SSB CT: BHK
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the Revision Petition is dismissed as
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 125.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.