SRI K M NAGARAJA BHATTA v. SMT VANAJAKSHI
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 160 OF 2020 (INJ) BETWEEN:
#1. SRI K M NAGARAJA BHATTA S/O K S MANJUNATHA BHATTA, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS R/O KIRANKERE VILLAGE MAKKIMANE POST, MUTHURU HOBLI, THIRTHAHALLI TALUK, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT - 577 432.
#2. K M RAGHAVENDRA S/O K S MANJUNATHA BHATTA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O KIRANKERE VILLAGE, MAKKIMANE POST, MUTHURU HOBLI, THIRTHAHALLI TALUK, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT - 577 432.
#3. K SHREESHA S/O K S MANJUNATHA BHATTA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/O KIRANKERE VILLAGE, MAKKIMANE POST, MUTHURU HOBLI, THIRTHAHALLI TALUK, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT - 577 432. - 2 - NC: 2026:KHC:26981 RSA No. 160 of 2020 HC-KAR
#4. K M KRISHNAMURTHY S/O MANJUNATHA BHATTA AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/O SVT ROAD, NEAR WATER TANK, KOPPA TOWN, KOPPA TALUK, CHICKMAGALUR DISTRICT - 577 126 (SUIT AGAINST DEFENDANT NO.1 IS ABATED ON 06-04-2015 SINCE HE IS DEAD) …APPELLANTS (SRI. K.M. NAGARAJA BHATTA AND OTHERS, APPELLANTS - VIDE ORDER DATED 16.10.2024, APPEAL AGAINST A1 STANDS ABATED) AND:
#1. SMT VANAJAKSHI @ VANAJAKSHAMMA W/O K V GOPALA BHATTA, AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS, R/O KIRANKERE VILLAGE, MAKKIMANE POST, MUTHURU HOBLI, THIRTHAHALLI TALUK, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT - 577 432.
#2. K G RAMESH S/O K V GOPALA BHATTA, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/O KIRANKERE VILLAGE, MAKKIMANE POST, MUTHURU HOBLI, THIRTHAHALLI TALUK, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT - 577 432. - 3 - NC: 2026:KHC:26981 RSA No. 160 of 2020 HC-KAR
#3. K.G. UMESHA S/O K.V. GOPALA BHATTA, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, R/O KIRANKERE VILLAGE, MAKKIMANE POST, MUTHURU HOBLI, THIRTHAHALLI TALUK, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT - 577 432. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.S.BALAGANGADHAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 22.11.2019, PASSED IN RA NO 23/2018, ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, THIRTHAHALLI, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 30.08.2018, PASSED IN O.S.NO.76/2012, ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, THIRTHAHALLI. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellantS had filed a memo for retirement. Therefore, this Court by the order dated
09.04.2026 issued Court notice. So far as appellant No.1 - 4 - NC: 2026:KHC:26981 RSA No. 160 of 2020 HC-KAR is concerned, already the appeal stands abated. So far as appellant Nos.2 and 3 ARE concerned, the Court notice is duly served. Appellant Nos.2 and 3 are called out. They are absent. Accordingly, left with no alternative, appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE BK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 35
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.