✦ Karnataka High Court

Criminal Petition No. 1158 of 2025 · Karnataka High Court

Criminal Petition No. 1158 of 2025S VISHWAJITH SHETTY

Case at a glance

Bench
S VISHWAJITH SHETTY

Outcome

Withdrawn

Criminal Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. Criminal Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for. Sd/- (S VISHWAJITH SHETTY) JUDGE List No.: 1 Sl No.: 49

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 08TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY CRIMINAL PETITION No.1158 OF 2025 BETWEEN: THIMMARAJU S/O SRINIVASA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/AT GULAKAMALE VILLAGE, UTTARAHALLI HOBLI, BENGALURU SOUTH, BENGALURU-560 082 Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA (BY SRI M KRISHNE GOWDA, ADVOCATE) AND: …PETITIONER STATE OF KARNATAKA STATE BY KAGGALIPURA P.S. REPRESENTED BY SPP, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE- 560 001. …RESPONDENT (BY SMT.N.ANITHA GIRISH, HCGP) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 CR.PC PRAYING TO PASS AN ORDER OF BAIL ENLARGING THE PETITIONER IN CRIME NO.70/2024 OF KAGGALIPURA POLICE, NOW IN S.C.NO.241/2024 AND PENDING TRIAL BEFORE HONBLE IX ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE U/S 120B, 302 R/W 34 OF IPC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:14909 CRL.P No. 1158 of 2025 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach this Court after examination of P.W.2.

2.

The submission is placed on record.

Operative part

3.

Criminal Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for. Sd/- (S VISHWAJITH SHETTY) JUDGE List No.: 1 Sl No.: 49

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Criminal Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 439; Indian Penal Code, 1860.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Criminal Petition No. 1158 of 2025). ← Search more judgments