✦ Karnataka High Court

SRI S B ARUNACHALA v. SRI M SURESH

Writ Petition No. 26654 of 2012RAVI MALIMATH

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

the petitioner today in the Court this Petition is dismissed

Provisions considered

Judgment

Operative part

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH WRIT PETITION NO.26654 OF 2012(GM-CPC) BETWEEN : SRI S B ARUNACHALA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, S/O.LATE D.C.BHASKARACHAR, PARTNER:M/S.SHARADA JEWELLERS, SHOP NO.53/1, D.DEVARAJ URS ROAD, MYSORE – 570 001. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI Y K NARAYANA SHARMA, ADVOCATE) AND : 1 SRI M SURESH AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, S/O.LATE M.ASWATH, RESIDING AT DOOR NO.1968-19-A, K.R.STREET, DEVARAJ MOHALLA, MYSORE – 570 001. 2 MYSORE CITY CORPORATION REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER, CORPORATION OFFICERS, 2 MYSORE – 570 001. ...RESPONDENTS ***** THIS WRIT PETITION FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 20.7.2012 PASSED IN RA.NO.281/2010 BY THE FAST TRACK COURT-III, MYSORE VIDE ANNEXURE-T AND STAY THE FURTHER PROCEEDINGS IN THE SAID RA.NO.281/2010 TILL THE DISPOSAL OF RSA.NO.1575/10 NOW PENDING IN THIS COURT. THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:- ORDER In view of the memo filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner today in the Court this Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- JUDGE rsk/-

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: the petitioner today in the Court this Petition is dismissed

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908; Constitution of India — arts. 226, 227.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 26654 of 2012). ← Search more judgments