✦ Karnataka High Court

SMT. PUTTACHELUVAMMA v. MAGMA HOUSING FINANCE

Writ Petition No. 16400 of 2017MINERVA CIRCLE

Case at a glance

Bench
MINERVA CIRCLE
Neutral citation
2024:KHC:44753

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. It appears that petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter, hence, the petition is dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE

Judgment

SMT. PUTTACHELUVAMMA, W/O LATE H.M. PUTTASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/AT NO. 28, NEW NO.33, SIHS 12TH CROSS ROAD, MAHALAKSHMI LAYOUT, BENGALURU - 560 086. (BY SRI. SANTHOSHA KOTARI.,ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) PETITIONER RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AND:

1.

MAGMA HOUSING FINANCE, NO.36, H.M.ASTRID, MINERVA CIRCLE, J.C.ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 002. REPRESENTED BY ITS AREA CREDIT MANAGER HFC AND BOARD RESOLUTION HOLDER MR. GOPINATHAN KRISHNA PRASHANTH.

2.

MR. MUGULUR ANANTH, SHASHTRY SURESH, S/O MUGULUR KRISHNAPPA A. SHASHRTY, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/AT NO. 912, 1 MC LAYOUT, 2ND CROSS, 5TH MAIN, VIJAYANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 040. (BY SRI. FRANCIS XAVIER., FOR R1) RESPONDENTS - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC:44753 WP No. 16400 of 2017 THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DTD.17.1.2017 VIDE ANNEX-L PASSED BY THE LEARNED METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, BENGALURU IN CRIMINAL MISC.NO.11465/2016, ALLOWING THE APPLICATION MADE BY THE R-1 AND ETC,. ADDITIONAL CHIEF VII THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER None appears of the petitioner. A perusal of the order sheet indicates that none appeared

2. for the petitioner on the earlier dates as also process fee has not been paid in respect of unserved respondent No.2.

3.

It appears that petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter, hence, the petition is dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 16400 of 2017). ← Search more judgments