Mstr. B Sandeep Vishal, 17 yrs v. Union of India -by its Prl. Secretary
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Petitions are dismissed as having become infructuous
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 226, 227
Judgment
Operative part
(By Sri Ramachandra G Bhat, Adv.) And: 1 2 3 Union of India -by its Prl. Secretary Ministry of Human Resource Development Govt. of India, Shastri Bhavan New Delhi Deputy Commissioner Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangatan MEG Centre, St.Johns Road Bangalore Principal Kendriya Vidyalaya MEG Centre, St.Johns Road Bangalore (By Sri G I Gachchinamath, Adv. For R1; Sri Vishnu Bhat, Adv. For R4-5) Petitioners Respondents Writ Petitions are filed under Art.226/227 of the Constitution praying to direct respondents to award grace marks and to promote the petitioners to 3 XII standard, etc. The Petitions coming on for hearing this day, Court made the following: ORDER Petitioners are before this Court seeking for a direction to the respondents to award grace marks and promote them to XII standard or in the alternative to conduct one more supplementary examination to failed students of XI C section of the 3rd respondent school. Heard the counsel representing the parties. There is no merit in the contention of the petitioners that they have not been given due opportunity. Further, on perusal of the marks obtained in the supplementary examination for which they had appeared, it is seen they have not qualified and they have come out with untenable grounds. Petitions are dismissed as having become infructuous. However, petitioners can pursue the further examination to be held and seek 4 admission to 12th standard on passing the subjects in which they have failed. An Sd/- Judge
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Petitions are dismissed as having become infructuous
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 226, 227.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.